Des Moines Register -- Obama +5 in Iowa

[nhmagic]

What part of the polls are wrong don't you guys understand.  You are deluding yourselves in believing that you will match us in turnout and enthusiasm.  30,000 people for a Romney Ryan rally and Obama is getting McCain size (sub 4000) crowds in some states.  At this point, that does not point to an Obama victory regardless of JJs rule about crowds.  We will win independents by high single to double digits and undecideds 80-20.  Your early voting is down considerably, no matter how hard you try to spin it.  

[nhmagic]

What part of the polls are wrong don't you guys understand.  You are deluding yourselves in believing that you will match us in turnout and enthusiasm.  30,000 people for a Romney Ryan rally and Obama is getting McCain size (sub 4000) crowds in some states.  At this point, that does not point to an Obama victory regardless of JJs rule about crowds.  We will win independents by high single to double digits and undecideds 80-20.  Your early voting is down considerably, no matter how hard you try to spin it.  

Lmao!

Stop grasping for straws. You know you're losing when you just flat out claim "the polls are wrong".
No, Mitt is not getting larger crowds than Obama, he's not getting McCain size crowds. The latest PPP Poll shows Obama pulling ahead among indies. Rasmussen has it tied. Wash/Post ABC says Obama is closing the gap.

I will happily proclaim it each day until election day.  We aren't losing.  You think we are losing because you happen to be wrong and will be amazed at the size of Romney's victory on Tuesday.  

And as for crowds, try again:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/11/wow-20000-30000-turn-out-to-see-romney-ryan-in-ohio-obama-draws-crowds-less-than-4000/

[nhmagic]

When you start using crowd size to justify that your side will win, instead of hard date.....then you know you have lost.

Hard data that have incorrect turnout models.

[nhmagic]

What part of the polls are wrong don't you guys understand.  You are deluding yourselves in believing that you will match us in turnout and enthusiasm.  30,000 people for a Romney Ryan rally and Obama is getting McCain size (sub 4000) crowds in some states.  At this point, that does not point to an Obama victory regardless of JJs rule about crowds.  We will win independents by high single to double digits and undecideds 80-20.  Your early voting is down considerably, no matter how hard you try to spin it.  

Didn't the Secret Service say they screened 15 000 at that Romney/Ryan rally? So either the campaign overstated their numbers, or there was a major security breach.

Well, I didn't hear that and most have been reporting 20-30k.  But you also have to remember, Secret Service isn't doing all of the screening, local and state cops do it too.

[nhmagic]

What part of the polls are wrong don't you guys understand.  You are deluding yourselves in believing that you will match us in turnout and enthusiasm.  30,000 people for a Romney Ryan rally and Obama is getting McCain size (sub 4000) crowds in some states.  At this point, that does not point to an Obama victory regardless of JJs rule about crowds.  We will win independents by high single to double digits and undecideds 80-20.  Your early voting is down considerably, no matter how hard you try to spin it.  

Lmao!

Stop grasping for straws. You know you're losing when you just flat out claim "the polls are wrong".
No, Mitt is not getting larger crowds than Obama, he's not getting McCain size crowds. The latest PPP Poll shows Obama pulling ahead among indies. Rasmussen has it tied. Wash/Post ABC says Obama is closing the gap.

I will happily proclaim it each day until election day.  We aren't losing.  You think we are losing because you happen to be wrong and will be amazed at the size of Romney's victory on Tuesday.  

Hahahahahahahahaha.  Okay.  Okay.  You know what?

I'm going to PM you with this quote of yours if Obama wins on Tuesday.

And... what the heck, I guess I'll put it in my signature, too.

Hey, be my guest man.