South African Election Maps and Stats (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:23:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  South African Election Maps and Stats (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: South African Election Maps and Stats  (Read 17642 times)
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« on: September 27, 2012, 08:00:53 PM »
« edited: February 02, 2013, 03:02:52 PM by Verkrampte Hoofleier »

I'm currently reading something really good about South Africa, and it got me back into South African stuff which is always fascinating. I also tapped into some untapped resources which are excellent and I'm able to make maps of the FPTP single-member ward component in the last local elections (2011), for all municipalities.

I've started out with Johannesburg



I think the main patterns should be quite obvious, though there are a few interesting results here and there.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2012, 09:48:04 AM »

Wow, some of those ANC wards must be quite dense.

They're densely populated black townships, such as Soweto. In those places, if the ANC shade is fairly light compared to its surroundings, it is often due to an independent candidate or the IFP.

The black population in Joburg is plurality Zulu, so the IFP has had a little foothold historically, but urban Zulus in Gauteng have historically supported the ANC more than the IFP.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2012, 10:26:58 AM »
« Edited: September 28, 2012, 10:28:47 AM by Hashemite »

What are those three blue wards in that dense ANC territory? One even appears to be around 60% DA but surrounded by >70% ANC wards.

In the Soweto area?

The most solidly DA wards are 17 and 18 which cover Klipspruit West and Eldorado Park, both of which are Coloured neighborhoods (over 90% of the population). The ANC actually won ward 17 in 2006, but that's only because the Independent Democrats (a party which appealed largely to Coloureds, which has now merged into the DA and whose leader is now mayor of Cape Town) did really well there. In Cape Town, the IDs actually won a few wards in 2006 in the Coloured areas in the Flats. In 2011, the DA ate up the ID's old predominantly Coloured vote and also took some Coloured votes from the ANC - I believe the ANC might have won the Coloured vote in 2004, but it certainly lost it in 2009/2011 (in 1994, it is documented that the NP won a plurality or close to it of the Coloured vote).

Further south is ward 9, a DA gain in 2009. Along with ward 10 (a narrow ANC win only because it includes some black townships) it covers Lenasia, a heavily Indian/Asian area (60-80%). The DA probably won Lenasia on the whole in 2011, though not with huge margins. The other DA ward even further south is ward 7, which includes the largely Coloured neighborhood of Ennerdale.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2012, 12:25:53 PM »

Pretoria now



I have a few observations, but they will be for later.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2012, 09:09:29 AM »

So many wards.... I wish we had that many wards in Ottawa.

Compared to Canada, South Africa's municipal government is indeed huge. Johannesburg has 130 wards, but single-member wards only account for half of the seats in any municipal council - the other half are elected by list PR. Hence, Johannesburg's city council has 260 members.

Pretoria has 105 wards, and 260 councillors in all. Cape Town has 111 wards and 221 councillors.

It is also worth noting that the cities I've done thus far are all metropolitan municipalities, of which there are 8. In rural areas, there are two levels: the district (which has a council, 40% of which is elected directly by party list PR; the rest nominated by municipalities) which includes a number of municipalities (50% wards+50% PR). Metro municipalities are a kind of unitary authority.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2012, 11:03:54 AM »

So Pretoria is set up like an American city, just with the races inverted.

Not really, it seems a more apt comparison would be to large cities in Europe, especially France, with a wealthy core and impoverished black and brown suburbs.

Pretoria's CBD is actually a fairly low-income and black majority area, as evidenced by the ANC and weak DA wards downtown. The wealthy white Afrikaner areas are actually inner suburbs of Pretoria; the black townships are outer suburbs which aren't part of the old city of Pretoria itself (Mabopane, Soshanguve, Mamelodi, Atteridgeville). Johannesburg is similar, the CBD is black majority and low-income.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2012, 09:24:16 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
What? Why? To someone with little to no knowledge of SA this seems really counter-intuitive. The only thing I can think of is some kind of Afrikaans-speaking solidarity between Coloured people and white Afrikaners. Seems weird that that would be enough to cause people to vote for a party that was for denying them basic human rights just a few years before.

I'm not sure of the exact reasons (but I'm reading a book which will hopefully tell me more), but there's always been an issue of the ANC being perceived as being too much of a "Bantu/black" party. There must also have been an element of some wanting to protect their few privileges, because while Apartheid treated them like sh**t it didn't quite treat them as sub-humans (by which I mean, in the apartheid's racial hierarchy, the Coloureds weren't at the bottom).
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2012, 09:46:43 PM »
« Edited: September 30, 2012, 11:42:15 AM by Hashemite »

Good work. Keep the maps coming!

How about a Durban or a Port Elizabeth map?

Here's Port Elizabeth. For those more or less unaware, it was one of the DA's top targets in 2011, they fell just short of knocking the ANC off but they did win a remarkable 40% of the vote (they won like 28% in 2009, though COPE took 17% and 24% in the 2006 locals). The ANC won 52%, down from 66% in 2006. The map is rather interesting and tells us where the DA's massive surge came from:



For completion's sake, I also did a DA vote by ward:



A 2006 map would be interesting, but maybe later. The DA basically won every white person (really impressive 90% in the cracker Anglo wards down south) but also consolidated the Coloured vote to a very impressive level (65-75% if not more, in general, I'd guess, which is pretty huge). There are some Coloured wards which seem a bit less solidly DA, it is often because the boundaries also include some predominantly black townships. From my anecdotal observations (Google Street View FTW!) some really run-down Coloured precincts might have been a bit less DA than less run-down areas. Maybe. The Coloured vote is a really interesting thing anywhere, so if anybody wants me to dig down to the precinct level for details on Coloured neighborhoods, I will happily oblige.

In contrast, the DA's breakthrough really didn't happen in black townships. They won roughly 1% in the townships (which, being 99% black, can be assumed to have basically no non-black voters), which is still better than 2006 when they probably took below 1%. In most 99% black wards, the COPE placed second and sometimes the UDM (which is strong in Eastern Cape, but not really in Port Elizabeth - it's real base is Umtata, the political base of its leader, Bantu Holomisa, who was the boss of the old Transkei homeland until 94) pushed the DA into fourth.

(and yeah, the random ANC stronghold ward in the south surrounded by 90%+ DA crackerland is a big black township... I guess the rich whites need to close the gap between rich and poor Tongue)

Cape Town is next up on the list.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2012, 09:47:03 AM »

Yeah, Lewis is correct. The NP did better with urban coloureds than rural coloureds, and that still seems to be the case today.

BRTD, in 1994, the DP was even more of the Rich (Anglo) Whites Party than it is today.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2012, 10:38:00 AM »

Is there still a significant division in voting patterns between white Anglos and Afrikaners? [Probably stupid question but I don't know much about contemporary SA elections]

I never got around to posting my comments on Pretoria, but I was going to say that throughout the white wards in the city - Pretoria's white are of course largely Afrikaner - in 2006, the VF+ won on average 6-15% and often placed a distant second behind the DA. In 2011, the DA really ate into the VF+ vote - hell, in Orania, the DA won 40% against only 50% for the VF+.

The differences had already become lesser by the end of Apartheid, the NP broke through with Anglos in 1966 (in Natal, the NP won like 16% in 1961 but jumped to 40% in 1966 iirc) and henceforth maintained a solid base of support with Anglos to the point where I'd wager that they did roughly as well with Anglos than with Afrikaners in 1989 (the far-right KP pulled a lot of far-right Afrikaner votes from them in the Transvaal and OFS, but it didn't have any sizable Anglo support of course).
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2012, 11:59:27 AM »

DA vote by ward for the two other cities I had already done, revealing some interesting stuff:





I changed the scale to create a lower 0-5% category (and updated PE map accordingly). It is interesting to point out that the DA's performance in black townships in both Joburg and Pretoria was slightly better than in Port Elizabeth, where they consistently took barely 1%. In Joburg and Pretoria, while they fell below 5% in a number of wards, the DA managed up to 7-10% in some black township wards and where they were below 5% they were closer to 5% than to 0%.

In Joburg, this likely had something to do with the DA's mayoral candidate - Mmusi Maimane - a young black from Soweto but also, perhaps, with the incompetence of the incumbent ANC administration which had a terrible record on service delivery. However, Pretoria's DA candidate was some white dude, so I suspect the big reason why the DA did better in Joburg/Pretoria than Port Elizabeth with blacks is because the COPE was a bigger factor in Port Elizabeth. It had won 17% in 2009 and while its 4% in 2011 was an utter disaster for an epic fail of a party, it won around 5-10% in the black wards and placed consistent distant seconds behind the ANC.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2012, 02:25:26 PM »

Hashemite, do you think you could do vote strength maps for COPE in PE? Looking at the 2009 results it looks like they got some votes from blacks but also did well among  coloureds (Northern Cape was their best province, IIRC, and looking at the map on wiki it looks like they actually won a few wards in rural WC/NC that I think are mostly coloured). I'd be interested to see how well they did in some of the coloured areas of PE.

I won't do a map just yet, but here are some COPE performances in predominantly Coloured neighborhoods, by ward:

Ward 13, Helenvale (98% C): 1.24% ward, 1.34% PR
Ward 32, Hillside (95%)-Salsoneville (97%)-Salt Lake (96%): 0.91% ward, 1.03% PR
Ward 35, Sanctor (99%)-West End (97%): 0.96% ward, 0.88% PR
Ward 34, Arcadia (95%): 1.97% ward, 1.63% PR
Ward 37 (this likely includes some black areas): 3.06% ward, 3.54% PR
Ward 29 (might include a few black precincts): 3.95% ward, 1.96% PR
Ward 41, Booyen Park (97%)+a large black slum area: 2.76% ward, 2.6% PR
Ward 49, Rosedale (96%)-Mountain View (95%): 1.16% ward, 2.26% PR
Ward 10, Gelvandale (94%)-Gelvan Park (88%)-Parkside (89%): 0.79% ward, 0.85% PR
Ward 7-Precinct 277, Shauderville (97%): 3.22% ward, 3.11% PR

In contrast, some selected black township wards:

Ward 14: 11.49% ward, 11.29% PR
Ward 15: 8.38% ward/PR
Ward 16: 10.24% ward, 9.42% PR
Ward 17: 7.76% ward, 7.75% PR
Ward 18: 6.14% ward, 5.73% PR
Ward 19: 10.25% ward, 9.49% PR
Ward 59: 10.87% ward, 10.45% PR

etc...

I'm kind of frustrated that the 2009 results aren't available by ward and the precinct data might be iffy given that some precincts changed boundaries between 2009 and 2011 and there's no way of knowing which ones did and didn't and if they changed numbers.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2012, 04:24:36 PM »

I've gotten my hand on 2009 GE results by ward, so hopefully I can do something interesting with that, but before any of that I'll need to work out any boundary changes between 2009 and 2011 :S

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2012, 06:02:15 PM »

I've been looking at 2009 results by ward in PE, and while still not sure about boundary changes, here's something interesting.

COPE's best ward was ward 30:
ANC 65.6%, COPE 31.2%, UDM 1%, DA 0.7%

In 2011, the PR list vote went ANC 82.4%, COPE 10.9%, DA 3.8%, UDM 1.3%. In the ward vote, an indie took 20.4%, almost all from the ANC which won only 64.3% on that ballot.

It is naturally a 99% black ward or so, but it's fairly interesting. It includes Soweto on Sea, a really run down ghetto/shantytown, but also Kwamagxaki, a fairly black middle-class type of area (Google StreetView will show you).

Results by precinct:
Kwamagxaki (2011 PR results)
10250682:
ANC 53.1% (76.8%)
COPE 42.7% (15.7%)
UDM 1.3% (0.7%)
DA 1.2% (4.9%)

10250862
ANC 49.9% (76.3%)
COPE 45.9% (13.2%)
UDM 1.4% (2.5%)
DA 0.9% (7%)

Soweto on Sea (2011 PR results)
10250693:
ANC 85.4% (89.8%)
COPE 12.6% (6.3%)
UDM 0.7% (0.9%)
DA 0.3% (1.8%)

10250705
ANC 82.3% (91.9%)
COPE 15.5% (5.1%)
DA 0.5% (0.6%)

10251740
ANC 83.6% (82%)
COPE 13.2% (12.5%)
UDM 1.4% (0.7%)
DA 0.8% (1.8%)

That indie won over 40% in 10250705 and 10250693, which lie east of a main artery which seems to divide the shantytown. The indie won crumbs in Kwamagxaki.

I do hope this interests somebody besides me Sad
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2012, 06:42:14 PM »

I have 2006-2009 ward boundaries!

I will certainly finish Cape Town 2011 first, but any urgent requests for 2009 maps? I can easily do some party vote maps too.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2012, 05:53:12 AM »
« Edited: October 05, 2012, 09:31:36 AM by Tyd Om Te Trek? »

Language (especially as defined by the census) is very much a cover for race, and in my interpretation of South African politics, race trumps basically every other factor.

Here is Cape Town 2011





Comments:

No cookies for guessing where white people live, or even for guessing where Coloured people live. The coloured wards were very strong for the DA, with over 65-70% in most and nearing 80-85% in a good number of them.

The exceptions for this seem to be Atlantis, an isolated and economically deprived "exurban" type town in the far north of the city's legal boundaries, where the ANC managed 25-35% in almost all polls, which is fairly strong. There seems to be a predominantly Coloured area in the urban core, Vogelvlei, which voted ANC (with 55%). It is a shantytown-type area, but that can't explain it because tons of Coloured shantytowns voted DA.

Wards which appear to be 'tight' - eg the winning percentage is low (45-55%) do not usually indicate racially mixed areas but rather polarized wards which include black areas and white/coloured areas. If you were to look at them at the precinct level, you would see the usual racial polarization.

A weird thing is also the University of the Western Cape which voted 84% or so ANC, I don't know if this is a predominantly black campus.

On the linguistic aspect of things, however, with the DA's crap-poor performances even in Cape Town's black wards, I am left wondering if Xhosa black voters (as most blacks in Cape Town are) might be more inclined to voting ANC or at least not voting for the DA than other black voters (Joburg/Pretoria blacks are mainly either Zulu, Sotho or Tswana). Mandela was a Xhosa (as was Mbeki) so perhaps that might play a role. The DA did increase its vote in black areas compared to 2006, for sure, but their vote remains extremely low (even as an incumbent party with a strong governance record, which is the DA's strategy for winning over black voters).

Any requests for 2009 or 2011 maps?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2012, 09:32:58 AM »

Updated the above post with my comments and observations for Cape Town. But I do hope that more people than just me and my fantastic follower drj101 are following this Sad
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 06, 2012, 08:49:20 AM »

In the meantime, here's something on which I've always sought out more information: apartheid-era white-only elections. I got my hand on 1987 results, here they are in Google Maps:

https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=204535606153981578947.0004cb583e8faf4020459&msa=0&ll=-26.833875,31.333008&spn=6.712698,11.634521
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2012, 07:27:59 PM »

No comments on 1987? Anyhow, here's Durban, with a bunch of maps because it's interesting











The IFP and the NFP's strength track one another fairly closely. The remnants of strong IFP votes are seats they held in 2006, plus some random place (won by the DA) where it got 31% on the ward vote but only 14.7% on the list vote, that difference between the IFP ward and PR votes all going to the DA.

The MF is the Minority Front, a racial (Indian) and regional party led by Amichand Rajbansi up until 2011. Amichand Rajbansi was the chief minister for the Indians during the tricameral legislature era, he was basically a very corrupt party boss. The MF is by no means the sole party for Indians, the Indian vote in Durban in 2011 was split with the DA with a few crumbs for the ANC. I can't really tell if there's any difference between Indians who vote DA or MF, but I think the MF's vote is heavily personalist/ward-based these days and a lot of it votes for the DA in national elections anyways (for example, while the MF got some 6% in Durban in 2011, it got only a bit over 2% in 2009 GE iirc).

I will look into doing some parts of rural KZN next, in 2011.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2012, 07:30:02 PM »

2009 GE in Joburg:



and the COPE vote in the city

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2012, 09:44:55 AM »

It's 1981, it used to be 1987 but apparently Google Maps overwrites the old stuff if you modify it.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2014, 08:51:06 PM »

Bump for good measure

Here's Mangaung MM (Bloemfontein) in 2011


Port Elizabeth in 2009


PE was one of COPE's best major cities in 2009, so...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.09 seconds with 13 queries.