MT: Public Policy Polling: Romney up five, three with Johnson (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:20:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MT: Public Policy Polling: Romney up five, three with Johnson (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT: Public Policy Polling: Romney up five, three with Johnson  (Read 3624 times)
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


« on: September 12, 2012, 02:45:18 PM »

Party id: R+1
2008: R +0

So for ppp: 2012=2008
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2012, 03:49:15 PM »

Party id: R+1
2008: R +0

So for ppp: 2012=2008

They have a highly competetive Senate race this year, so why shouldn't Democrats come out in force once again like in 2008 ?

I think that tester is less effective than obama to move dem voters...
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2012, 12:49:18 PM »

Polling Gary Johnson in Montana but not New Mexico is quite funny.

The NM poll was paid for by a private client, and said client didn't want Gary Johnson included in the poll.

Hey, that's exactly what I was going to post.

By the way, Umengus, how can you be such a troll? You only post about the partisan ID of the polls you don't like. And even if they are accurate, you ignore the facts and continue claiming that the poll is biased. Please, next time think about it before posting:

Highly competitive senate election -----> Higher dem turnout in a GOP state / Higher GOP turnout in dem states.

sorry guy but the party id is the base of the "polling science". That explains the differences of the results for different polls polling the same state at the same time.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2012, 04:19:11 AM »

No one is trying to shut off your opinions. What I think  we're all confused by is your incessant use of the word "troll," especially when you seem to be the consenus troll of the forum. I notice how you don't address that hyposcrisy at all. Care to now?

I have NO problem with discussion and disagreement, but is it possible for you to make it more than 2 posts without dropping the "troll" bomb?

It is hard to not use that word when describing right-wingers who completely ignore data, facts, and the public consensus to merely aggravate the rest of the people on this forum.

The 2012 board has long run amok with right wingers who troll - see above definition. I have been recently more vocal in my objections to the hackishness of said posters so that they can understand that the vast majority of forumites don't appreciate what they have turned this discussion section into.

Even I, a hackish liberal with -6.5 E/S score, am tired of you, Mondale84. I'm surprised you are a moderate (-3 in the PoliticalMatrix). So, please, calm down, read the poll, believe what you want to and let the rest of the people share, politely, their opinions.

BTW, I think Montana will go for Romney by 6 to 8 points, so, IMO, this poll is more accurate than Rasmussen, which had Romney leading by 17.

the ras poll was an outlier.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 15 queries.