Bush / Perot 92
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 03:30:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Bush / Perot 92
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bush / Perot 92  (Read 1818 times)
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 16, 2012, 02:08:55 AM »

Either Perot or Powell is tapped for VP, and either way Perot offers Bush his support.  Economy is doing alright, with unemployment decreasing.  What happens?  Unemployment is 6.5% on election day, discuss with maps.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,090
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2012, 03:45:44 AM »

Starting my map, I fully expected Clinton to get creamed. With that being said, here's the result:



Clinton - 270
Bush - 268
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2012, 03:23:51 PM »

Starting my map, I fully expected Clinton to get creamed. With that being said, here's the result:



Clinton - 270
Bush - 268

No offense but this doesn't look like an OFAK...
Logged
ask_not
donavan_ed
Rookie
**
Posts: 147
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 03:59:22 PM »

In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 09:09:50 PM »

In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.

I knew you were a troll
Logged
ask_not
donavan_ed
Rookie
**
Posts: 147
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2012, 02:15:08 PM »

In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.

I knew you were a troll
  excuse me ,I meant to say by  1996, with the g.o.p  in power for 16 straight years, the democrat"s will likely win in 96.
Logged
Tricky Dickie
Rookie
**
Posts: 17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2012, 02:27:49 PM »

I don't think Perot would have accepted being Bush's runnig mate.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2012, 03:01:39 PM »

In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.

I knew you were a troll
  excuse me ,I meant to say by  1996, with the g.o.p  in power for 16 straight years, the democrat"s will likely win in 96.

Oh ok
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2012, 03:02:26 PM »

I don't think Perot would have accepted being Bush's runnig mate.

I don't either, but if he did, would his otl 19% go to Bush's column?
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2012, 09:42:55 AM »

Really?  I thought you meant if Perot ran as the Democratic nominee.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2012, 05:17:34 PM »

Really?  I thought you meant if Perot ran as the Democratic nominee.

Oh no, that would've been interesting though.
Logged
Fuzzy Stands With His Friend, Chairman Sanchez
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,504
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2012, 07:42:34 PM »

Powell would have been a game-changer for Bush.  Perot would never have been VP, never, ever.

The only thing that could have beaten Bush under those circumstances would have been a 3rd party conservative insurgency of folks peeved about the dumping of Quayle.  Bush should have dumped Quayle, but he didn't want the flak.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 14 queries.