True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
Posts: 42,156
|
 |
« on: January 23, 2005, 02:44:05 PM » |
|
Overall, I'm neutral on this bill, but there are some provisions in it I don't like.
Section 3(b)(1): I'd prefer if it merely provided that children beyond the first don't qualify for these benefits rather than taking away the benefits provided the first child because of a second.
Section 3(b)(2): Do we really want a provision of law that will discourage unwed mothers from forming a stable married relationship with a loving partner?
Section 3(d)(3): I can see terminating benefits of the mother violates the spirit of this program, but I can't see that justifying placing the child in foster care.
|
