wv and vt 1988 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:50:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  wv and vt 1988 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: wv and vt 1988  (Read 2457 times)
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


« on: June 28, 2012, 01:34:11 PM »

New Englanders were still holding out hope that Bush would govern like moderate Republican presidents in the past. They were mistaken and punished him in 1992.

Dukakis ran an economically populist campaign. He was a typical, unoffensive, new deal type Democrat (despite the Bush campaign's best attempts to turn him into a leftist nutjob) and those Democrats typically did very well in West Virginia.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2012, 07:01:50 PM »

New Englanders were still holding out hope that Bush would govern like moderate Republican presidents in the past. They were mistaken and punished him in 1992.

Dukakis ran an economically populist campaign. He was a typical, unoffensive, new deal type Democrat (despite the Bush campaign's best attempts to turn him into a leftist nutjob) and those Democrats typically did very well in West Virginia.
Dukakis was a liberal on issues such as taxes and crime.

Ahh, I see Lee Atwater had an effect on you. Dukakis really wasn't in far left field on crime, but the Bush campaign made it seem that way. They ran the Willie Horton ad, which was incredibly controversial, but succeeded in making Dukakis look like a wimpy liberal when it came to crime. And maybe he was...but the prison furlough program that Dukakis was criticized for was actually first implemented by the governor of California - Ronald Reagan!
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2012, 03:16:02 PM »

New Englanders were still holding out hope that Bush would govern like moderate Republican presidents in the past. They were mistaken and punished him in 1992.

Dukakis ran an economically populist campaign. He was a typical, unoffensive, new deal type Democrat (despite the Bush campaign's best attempts to turn him into a leftist nutjob) and those Democrats typically did very well in West Virginia.
What? The New England states voted for Ronald Reagan(a conservative) twice except for RI which voted for Carter in 1980. Bush H.W. wasn't more moderate than Reagan? The guy raised taxes even after he said "no new taxes".

Even in the 1980s New England, specifically the more rural areas, was Republican based on history and tradition. Reagan's landslide in 1980 and 1984 helped keep New England in the column, despite states like Vermont still trending D.

Bush won New England more on his regional appeal, and yes, he did campaign as a moderate. But in 1992, he was primaried by the more conservative Pat Buchanan. In order to fend him off, he had to move farther to the right on social issues to keep his base. This pissed New Englanders off and it was one of the reasons they voted for Clinton.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.