Scottish Independence Referendum - 18 September 2014
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:39:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Scottish Independence Referendum - 18 September 2014
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37
Author Topic: Scottish Independence Referendum - 18 September 2014  (Read 146628 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,155
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #875 on: September 20, 2014, 11:01:04 AM »

Scotland will not become independent (54-46 against).

I knew it already back then ... !

Tongue

(don't look at my other 2014 predictions plz, some of these are pretty hilarious. Others too, for example Adam thinking Kasich will lose in a landslide to Fitzgerald).
Logged
Colbert
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 474
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #876 on: September 20, 2014, 11:37:30 AM »

if UK decide to leave EU, Scotland could make another referendum : "would you like scotland becoming an independante state AND member of EU"
Logged
DKrol
dkrolga
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #877 on: September 20, 2014, 02:50:55 PM »

if UK decide to leave EU, Scotland could make another referendum : "would you like scotland becoming an independante state AND member of EU"

I doubt the EU would let Scotland slide in like that. They were very clear that, should Yes have won on Thursday, Scotland would have to had apply like any other nation.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #878 on: September 20, 2014, 03:05:16 PM »

if UK decide to leave EU, Scotland could make another referendum : "would you like Scotland becoming an independent state AND member of EU"

I doubt the EU would let Scotland slide in like that. They were very clear that, should Yes have won on Thursday, Scotland would have to had apply like any other nation.

That question only imply that Scotland in this case would apply for membership at once if it became independent. Of course that wouldn't guarantee membership, but the EU would have no reason to block Scotland if the rest of UK left. That would set no dangerous precedent regarding Catalonia or other areas with  secessionist movements and the rUK would obviously not be in a position to block anything.

Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #879 on: September 24, 2014, 04:53:42 PM »

The elephant in the room with this whole Scottish independence debate is a pretty strident anti-Englishness within a large cross section of Scottish society.

Would anyone (particularly anyone from Scotland) care to comment on this?
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #880 on: September 24, 2014, 07:44:41 PM »

The elephant in the room with this whole Scottish independence debate is a pretty strident anti-Englishness within a large cross section of Scottish society.

Would anyone (particularly anyone from Scotland) care to comment on this?

If that was true, wouldn't "Yes" win?  I am not sure I understand what you're getting at.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #881 on: December 18, 2014, 04:26:58 PM »

Hi everyone.

Sorry for posting in a thread that no-one has posted in for over a month and on a "dead" topic (at this stage), but I've had a look at the vote shares per council area to try and find a pattern in the results - something that the BBC and Sky were struggling to do on the night.

Yes vote compared to DE social grade
Note: The DE% are the proportion of people living in that council area that fall into the DE social grade (the most impoverished people)

Council Area (Top 10 DE% shown) - DE% - Yes% - Yes Rank
  • Inverclyde - 35.1% - 49.9% - 5th
  • North Ayrshire - 34.8% - 48.9% - 6th
  • West Dunbartonshire - 34.4% - 54.0% - 2nd
  • Glasgow City - 34.0% - 53.5% - 3rd
  • North Lanarkshire - 33.1% - 51.1% - 4th
  • East Ayrshire - 32.8% - 47.2% - 7th
  • Clackmannanshire - 32.4% - 46.2% - 12th
  • Dundee City - 32.4% - 57.3% - 1st
  • Dumfries & Galloway - 31.9% - 34.3% - 30th
  • Renfrewshire - 29.8% - 47.2% - 8th

All of the top eight council areas to vote yes, were in the top ten areas with the highest proportion of people in the DE social grade category. Of course, there is an exception with Dumfries & Galloway, however that's most likely due to having a large English born population (around 18%) compared to the rest of Scotland.

Verdict: I calculated a tolerance of 66.5% between a high DE social grade and a high yes vote.

Yes vote compared to 1997 Vote
Note: I'm only taking into account the proportion of people in each council area who voted for there to be a Scottish Parliament. The question of taxation powers for the parliament is not considered.

Council Area (ordered by 1997% vote) - 1997% - 2014% (Rank)
  • West Dunbartonshire - 84.7% - 54.0% (2)
  • Glasgow City - 83.6% - 53.5% (3)
  • North Lanarkshire - 82.6% - 51.1% (4)
  • East Ayrshire - 81.1% - 47.2% (7)
  • Falkirk - 80.0% - 46.5% (11)
  • Clackmannanshire - 80.0% - 46.2% (12)
  • Midlothian - 79.9% - 43.7% (16)
  • West Lothian - 79.6% - 44.8% (15)
  • Eilean Siar - 79.4% - 46.6% (10)
  • Renfrewshire - 79.0% - 47.2% (8.)
  • Inverclyde - 78.0% - 49.9% (5)
  • South Lanarkshire - 77.8% - 45.3% (13)
  • North Ayrshire - 76.3% - 48.9% (6)
  • Fife - 76.1% - 45.0% (14)
  • Dundee City - 76.0% - 57.3% (1)
  • East Lothain - 74.2% - 38.3% (27)
  • Highland - 72.6% - 47.1% (9)
  • Edinburgh City - 71.9% - 38.9% (25)
  • Aberdeen City - 71.8% - 41.4% (21)
  • East Dunbartonshire - 69.8% - 38.8% (26)
  • Stirling - 68.5% - 40.2% (22)
  • Argyll & Bute - 67.3% - 41.5% (20)
  • Moray - 67.2% - 42.4% (18)
  • South Ayrshire - 66.9% - 42.1% (19)
  • Angus - 64.7% - 43.7% (17)
  • Aberdeenshire - 63.9% - 39.6% (24)
  • Scottish Borders - 62.8% - 33.4% (31)
  • Shetland - 62.4% - 36.3% (29)
  • Perth & Kinross - 61.7% - 39.8% (23)
  • East Renfrewshire - 61.7% - 36.8% (28)
  • Dumfries & Galloway - 60.7% - 34.3% (30)
  • Orkney - 57.3% - 32.8% (32)

Generally, the highest yes votes in 1997, were the highest yes votes in 2014. One exception to this being Dundee City - which had the highest yes vote in 2014, but only the 15th highest yes vote in 1997.

Verdict: Despite the Dundee City anomaly, there was a 82.0% tolerance between the two referendum results.

Other noted patterns
  • There was a strong tolerance between a higher life expectancy and a higher no vote. (80.1%)
  • There was a surprise pattern between the percentage of Catholics in a council area and a yes vote. (61.7%)
  • There was a pattern between the percentage of people who have a "British Only National Identity" in a council area and a no vote in that council area. (70.0%)
  • There was a strong tolerance between child poverty in a council area and a higher yes vote. (75.7%)

Notes
  • All data is from the 2011 Scottish Census, excluding life expectancy, child poverty rates and social grade - which is from aggregated local council data.
  • Due to having less than 20 posts, I was unable to add graphs and clearer tables to this post.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #882 on: December 18, 2014, 11:29:56 PM »

Nice work, as you can see in thread the Catholic/Yes correlation is not considered surprising around here only "amusing". Expect some jokes about people not wanting to live all that long in a Scotand run by SNP as well.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,559
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #883 on: December 20, 2014, 04:34:47 AM »

Yes, the Catholic thing was mentioned on here at the time (on the results thread, not this one), but it's good to see it confirmed that it appears in the data.  In most areas, of course, we only have authority-level data, but it was also observed in the results thread that in the more local data released by North Lanarkshire council Airdrie was more No than Coatbridge.  (For those who don't know, these are neighbouring towns but Airdrie is very Protestant and Coatbridge very Catholic.)

The socio-economic factors make sense as well; I noticed at the time that in the Glasgow area the middle class suburban districts (East Renfrewshire and East Dunbartonshire) were quite strongly No while the rest of the area tended to Yes.

I think there was a tendency in the media to expect that areas with SNP MPs would be strongest for Yes, but it didn't play out like that (barring Dundee East, I suppose).
Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #884 on: December 20, 2014, 06:06:26 AM »

Thanks to Clyde1998 for the useful correlations.

Yes, the Catholic thing was mentioned on here at the time (on the results thread, not this one), but it's good to see it confirmed that it appears in the data.  In most areas, of course, we only have authority-level data, but it was also observed in the results thread that in the more local data released by North Lanarkshire council Airdrie was more No than Coatbridge.  (For those who don't know, these are neighbouring towns but Airdrie is very Protestant and Coatbridge very Catholic.)

The socio-economic factors make sense as well; I noticed at the time that in the Glasgow area the middle class suburban districts (East Renfrewshire and East Dunbartonshire) were quite strongly No while the rest of the area tended to Yes.

I think there was a tendency in the media to expect that areas with SNP MPs would be strongest for Yes, but it didn't play out like that (barring Dundee East, I suppose).

Is it the case that:
1. Yes vote is "caused" by low socioeconomic status, in the sense that status pre-existed the vote and there does not seem to be any omitted variable;
2. Catholic districts are correlated with low socioeconomic status;
3. Controlling for 1, Catholic areas would not be significantly more likely to vote Yes
?

We need a logistic regression.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,559
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #885 on: December 20, 2014, 10:02:59 AM »

Thanks to Clyde1998 for the useful correlations.

Yes, the Catholic thing was mentioned on here at the time (on the results thread, not this one), but it's good to see it confirmed that it appears in the data.  In most areas, of course, we only have authority-level data, but it was also observed in the results thread that in the more local data released by North Lanarkshire council Airdrie was more No than Coatbridge.  (For those who don't know, these are neighbouring towns but Airdrie is very Protestant and Coatbridge very Catholic.)

The socio-economic factors make sense as well; I noticed at the time that in the Glasgow area the middle class suburban districts (East Renfrewshire and East Dunbartonshire) were quite strongly No while the rest of the area tended to Yes.

I think there was a tendency in the media to expect that areas with SNP MPs would be strongest for Yes, but it didn't play out like that (barring Dundee East, I suppose).

Is it the case that:
1. Yes vote is "caused" by low socioeconomic status, in the sense that status pre-existed the vote and there does not seem to be any omitted variable;
2. Catholic districts are correlated with low socioeconomic status;
3. Controlling for 1, Catholic areas would not be significantly more likely to vote Yes
?

We need a logistic regression.

Yep, and figures from smaller areas...

How do Coatbridge and Airdrie compare on things other than religious background?
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #886 on: December 20, 2014, 01:36:41 PM »

Thanks to Clyde1998 for the useful correlations.

Yes, the Catholic thing was mentioned on here at the time (on the results thread, not this one), but it's good to see it confirmed that it appears in the data.  In most areas, of course, we only have authority-level data, but it was also observed in the results thread that in the more local data released by North Lanarkshire council Airdrie was more No than Coatbridge.  (For those who don't know, these are neighbouring towns but Airdrie is very Protestant and Coatbridge very Catholic.)

The socio-economic factors make sense as well; I noticed at the time that in the Glasgow area the middle class suburban districts (East Renfrewshire and East Dunbartonshire) were quite strongly No while the rest of the area tended to Yes.

I think there was a tendency in the media to expect that areas with SNP MPs would be strongest for Yes, but it didn't play out like that (barring Dundee East, I suppose).

Is it the case that:
1. Yes vote is "caused" by low socioeconomic status, in the sense that status pre-existed the vote and there does not seem to be any omitted variable;
2. Catholic districts are correlated with low socioeconomic status;
3. Controlling for 1, Catholic areas would not be significantly more likely to vote Yes
?

We need a logistic regression.
1 - YesScotland based their campaign on equality - if Scotland was independent, the country would be able to become more equal through changes in policies. The poorer areas would have seen this as an opportunity to increase their socio-economic status, where as richer people may have felt that it could hinder theirs.

2 - There is a 40.5% correlation between high Catholic population and a high DE economic status. The top four catholic areas (Inverclyde, North Lanarkshire, West Dunbartonshire, Glasgow) are in the top five for yes support. These are also the only areas where the Catholic population outnumbers the Protestant population. Dundee has a high DE population, but has a relatively lower Catholic population (compared to the aforementioned council areas) - Dundee had the highest Yes vote.

3 - Areas with a high Catholic population were more inclined to vote yes than areas with lower Catholic populations. However, areas with low Catholic populations were still above the national average for a yes vote - such a Highland.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #887 on: December 20, 2014, 01:49:08 PM »

In other news, I hear that the price of oil has collapsed.
Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #888 on: December 20, 2014, 01:59:43 PM »

I suppose my question was about whether there was any difference between Catholics and Protestants of similar socioeconomic status.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #889 on: December 20, 2014, 02:07:59 PM »

It looks likely, yes.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #890 on: December 20, 2014, 02:16:48 PM »

I suppose my question was about whether there was any difference between Catholics and Protestants of similar socioeconomic status.
I think Catholics generally voted yes and Protestants generally voted no (although Eilean Siar was around 46% yes, with a large Protestant population). However, only 14 council areas have a Catholic and Protestant total of 50% of their population, so the effect of religion would have been smaller in the remaining 18 areas.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #891 on: December 20, 2014, 03:20:59 PM »

In other news, I hear that the price of oil has collapsed.

Victory to the Politics of Fear!
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #892 on: December 21, 2014, 09:33:38 AM »

In the future Patronising Better Together Woman will be seen as a prophet.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #893 on: December 21, 2014, 06:34:02 PM »

Alex Salmond is predicting another referendum in 2017.

With the SNP at 51% for the next Scottish election - it might well happen...

Scottish Parliament 2016 Projection (based on today's Survation poll)
SNP - 69 seats (N/C)
Labour - 28 seats (-9)
Conservative - 15 seats (N/C)
Green - 7 seats (+5)
UKIP - 5 seats (+5)
Lib Dem - 4 seats (-1)
Socialists - 1 seat (+1)
Independent - 0 seats (-1)

The pro-independence front is up to 77 (+5) in this projection, with the SNP staying strong and the Greens and Socialists gaining.

If the polls since the referendum are to be believed - then a majority want independence right now.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #894 on: December 21, 2014, 06:50:48 PM »

Alex Salmond is predicting another referendum in 2017.

With the SNP at 51% for the next Scottish election - it might well happen...

Scottish Parliament 2016 Projection (based on today's Survation poll)
SNP - 69 seats (N/C)
Labour - 28 seats (-9)
Conservative - 15 seats (N/C)
Green - 7 seats (+5)
UKIP - 5 seats (+5)
Lib Dem - 4 seats (-1)
Socialists - 1 seat (+1)
Independent - 0 seats (-1)

The pro-independence front is up to 77 (+5) in this projection, with the SNP staying strong and the Greens and Socialists gaining.

If the polls since the referendum are to be believed - then a majority want independence right now.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11095188/Alex-Salmond-pledges-no-second-Scottish-referendum.html Reminder of this.

And these polls showing independence ahead are, of course, hypothetical. Do you all really need reminding that in the real thing, just 3 months ago, 'No' won by a larger than expected margin.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #895 on: December 21, 2014, 07:04:33 PM »

Alex Salmond is predicting another referendum in 2017.

With the SNP at 51% for the next Scottish election - it might well happen...

Scottish Parliament 2016 Projection (based on today's Survation poll)
SNP - 69 seats (N/C)
Labour - 28 seats (-9)
Conservative - 15 seats (N/C)
Green - 7 seats (+5)
UKIP - 5 seats (+5)
Lib Dem - 4 seats (-1)
Socialists - 1 seat (+1)
Independent - 0 seats (-1)

The pro-independence front is up to 77 (+5) in this projection, with the SNP staying strong and the Greens and Socialists gaining.

If the polls since the referendum are to be believed - then a majority want independence right now.
And these polls showing independence ahead are, of course, hypothetical. Do you all really need reminding that in the real thing, just 3 months ago, 'No' won by a larger than expected margin.
Salmond isn't SNP leader anymore - so Sturgeon could put another referendum of the SNP manifesto for the 2016 Scottish election. Salmond did say in his interview - that he believes that there will be an EU referendum in 2017, which would trigger another independence referendum.

The polls only showed two yes leads in 2014 before the referendum. There have been three (of four) showing yes leads since the referendum. Even if independence isn't ahead, then there has almost certainly been movement towards that option.

The final opinion polls, for each pollster, of the referendum showed (including don't knows):
Ipsos Mori - 45% yes.
Survation - 43% yes.
YouGov - 45% yes.
Panelbase - 45% yes.
ICM - 41% yes.
Opinium - 43% yes.

Average - 43.7% yes. The undecided voters split 12.3% to yes and 87.7% to no, which isn't unrealistic.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #896 on: December 21, 2014, 07:10:12 PM »

Vote again until you get it right Smiley Smiley Smiley
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #897 on: December 21, 2014, 07:13:18 PM »

Neverendum. Wink
Logged
Lurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 765
Norway
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #898 on: December 21, 2014, 07:52:08 PM »

So, "a generation" apparently means three years. Tongue
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #899 on: December 22, 2014, 08:52:30 AM »

So, "a generation" apparently means three years. Tongue
The SNP are saying that there will only be another referendum earlier than in the next 10-15 years, if there is a major constitutional change in that time. A 2017 referendum would only take place, if there is a referendum on EU membership, where the UK votes to leave, but Scotland votes to stay - something that looks quite likely at this point.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 11 queries.