TX PrimR: University of Texas: Romney with 60+ support (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:26:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  TX PrimR: University of Texas: Romney with 60+ support (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX PrimR: University of Texas: Romney with 60+ support  (Read 12598 times)
Taft
Rookie
**
Posts: 44


« on: May 22, 2012, 11:16:50 PM »

I must confess that I'm a bit surprised that Paul isn't a bit closer to 20%...but then again, I've been surprised that there hasn't been more of a sustained "not Romney" vote of sorts in a few places (such as the South).  Not shocked, but a bit surprised.
Logged
Taft
Rookie
**
Posts: 44


« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2012, 04:20:41 AM »
« Edited: May 27, 2012, 04:26:26 AM by Taft »

Perry's off the ballot.  If he were on, I'd be pegging him to win somewhere over 20% without a campaign (let's see...popular Governor...ignored contest...lots of turnout for unrelated races...).  If he'd gotten severely ticked off at Romney for some reason and decided to fight for seating "his" slate towards the end, I wouldn't bet against him pulling an upset if Romney didn't fight back (again, see the bit before and add in room for a "Perry for Texas" campaign to give Romney some real heartburn).  Bear in mind he was still on 18% there when he dropped out of the race (vs. <10% nationally), and that was with four other "main" candidates in there.

However, unlike a lot of other cases, a lot of this would be "pro-Perry" voting as much as "anti-Romney" protest voting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.