WMD in Iraq (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:54:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  WMD in Iraq (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think there are WMD now? / Did you think so when the war started?
#1
No/No
 
#2
No/Yes
 
#3
Yes/No
 
#4
Yes/Yes
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: WMD in Iraq  (Read 15933 times)
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« on: January 13, 2005, 01:28:43 AM »

The question is not well worded.  The 60 or so chemical shells that were in Iraq at the time of invasion are not there now, so technically the answer in no/yes, but since there were weapons, I voted yes/yes.

And I once again return your attention to exhibit A in the trial of Saddam's WMD.  There were 500 tons of uranium at the Tuwaitha Nuclear Facility, 2 and 1/2 tons of which had been enriched.  Most estimates state that this is enough for 150 or so warheads once all of it was fully enriched.

I assume you're posting this to demonstrate that the Iraqi Survey Group has officially ended the weapons search.  Before anyone tries to use them as a source to undermine the war, remember that David Kay, the head of that group said publcily that large stockpiles of weapons were moved to Syria.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 17 queries.