Corrected for "the calendar," Mittens running 4-6% better than McCain in 2008

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Obama - sure.

Clinton 1992? No. Clinton didn't lose 10 states.

Reagan in 1980? Same deal.

[Negusa Nagast 🚀]

Arguably, Dukakis's 1988 primary performance was better than any Reagan (1980)

I don't know what to say other than:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You really don't have a good grasp on what constitutes a strong primary performance, do you?

[I'm JewCon in name only.]

I think this is a pretty clear sign that Mitt Romney is a very weak presidential nominee.

Mitt Romney reminds me of that guy who's always smug, and cocky, and just idk, his face is just filled with the soul of Satan.

[J. J.]

Arguably, Dukakis's 1988 primary performance was better than any Reagan (1980)

I don't know what to say other than:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You really don't have a good grasp on what constitutes a strong primary performance, do you?

No, Dukakis actually shut down the nomination process sooner than Reagan did.  It is amazing how bad memory is.

[Fuzzybigfoot]

Does this conversation have any relevance to the election at hand?

[J. J.]

Does this conversation have any relevance to the election at hand?

If that argument is "Romney is the weakest frontrunner since... .," yes.