Why does Romney constantly remind everyone he's rich?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 03:57:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why does Romney constantly remind everyone he's rich?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Why does Romney constantly remind everyone he's rich?  (Read 2672 times)
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2012, 10:34:16 PM »

I'm ok with it. Rather than looking at voting for the poorest candidate, I vote for who would do the best job. It's not like he's going to have a $1 billion campaign like the party he's running against and I'll leave it at that for now.

Not our fault you don't have any small donors.......
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2012, 10:36:04 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.
Logged
Tidewater_Wave
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2012, 10:41:26 PM »

I'm ok with it. Rather than looking at voting for the poorest candidate, I vote for who would do the best job. It's not like he's going to have a $1 billion campaign like the party he's running against and I'll leave it at that for now.

Not our fault you don't have any small donors.......

Obama is the one with the $1 billion campaign led by George Soros and Warren Buffet.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2012, 10:44:58 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.

Yeah, you may be right.

Nixon was a shrewd politician, you can't say the same about Romney.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,185
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2012, 10:45:43 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.

Mitt Romney isn't running for re-election.  And you're the one who brought up JFK, whose opponent was whom?

By the way, the usual preface for the type of sentence you posted is "uh", not "ah".  "Ah" generally prefaces a "I didn't know that" or "it seems you're right" type of sentence, not a sarcastic "you're an idiot" type comment.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 01, 2012, 10:49:01 PM »

I'm ok with it. Rather than looking at voting for the poorest candidate, I vote for who would do the best job. It's not like he's going to have a $1 billion campaign like the party he's running against and I'll leave it at that for now.

Not our fault you don't have any small donors.......

Obama is the one with the $1 billion campaign led by George Soros and Warren Buffet.

You do realize that nearly half of Obama's money is coming from small donors.  Obama has big time supporters as well, but he isn't top heavy like Romney.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 01, 2012, 10:52:52 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.

Mitt Romney isn't running for re-election.  And you're the one who brought up JFK, whose opponent was whom?

Yes, it was the poor Richard Nixon, who went on to be elected twice.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

In my neighborhood, it's "ah."  It might be a regional thing.
Logged
Tidewater_Wave
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 01, 2012, 11:01:51 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.

Mitt Romney isn't running for re-election.  And you're the one who brought up JFK, whose opponent was whom?

Yes, it was the poor Richard Nixon, who went on to be elected twice.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

In my neighborhood, it's "ah."  It might be a regional thing.

You must be from my area. Going dahn tahn. Yinz worsh your hans at nat spicket. Jeet yet? Don't hit any babushkas on the way home. Hold on I gotta fill up my tank with carbon oil. Dude next time I'm in town we'll go out for some kulbasi and sauerkraut.  One more thing... Kennywood is open!
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 01, 2012, 11:05:49 PM »

I'm very much looking forward to the general election campaign:



Hate to tell you this, but it worked for JFK and FDR.  Smiley

Problem is Romney isn't Kennedy or FDR in this race, he closer to Nixon and Hoover.

Ah, the only state Nixon lost was MA in 1972.  You might want to use another analogy.

Mitt Romney isn't running for re-election.  And you're the one who brought up JFK, whose opponent was whom?

Yes, it was the poor Richard Nixon, who went on to be elected twice.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

In my neighborhood, it's "ah."  It might be a regional thing.

You must be from my area. Going dahn tahn. Yinz worsh your hans at nat spicket. Jeet yet? Don't hit any babushkas on the way home. Hold on I gotta fill up my tank with carbon oil. Dude next time I'm in town we'll go out for some kulbasi and sauerkraut.  One more thing... Kennywood is open!

Darn close to Pittsburghese there.  Smiley  I'm half John Heinz and half Rocky.  Wink
Logged
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 02, 2012, 01:44:32 AM »

It's perfectly ok for Romney to be rich.  Most people who run for office are better off than the average voter, and the average voter knows that, they don't need to be informed of the fact.  It doesn't stop the average voter from voting for candidates.  The thing with Mitt is that he finds ways to subtly boast about his wealth so often.  I've been watching politics fairly closely for more than thirty years, and I have never, ever, seen a candidate either overtly or subtly taut their wealth like Mitt does.  Even under normal circumstances, not to mention during a time when the country is a difficult economic circumstances, it's f*^#in' creepy.  I don't remember him talking like this when he ran in '08.  Since he is clearly not doing it for political gain, it must be a part of who he is, and it isn't appealing.  At all.
Logged
Tidewater_Wave
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 02, 2012, 01:55:09 AM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 04, 2012, 10:44:41 PM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

If your father was a corporate executive, you too can be successful!
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 04, 2012, 11:04:12 PM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

I'm now imagining an ad going something like this:

Success in life is measured by one's wealth. And I am extremely wealthy. I am richer than Obama, richer than you, and richer than all the other candidates combined. I will thus be the most successful president we have ever had. I will inspire our economy to flourish. All the folks out there struggling financially will see me as an inspiration, and our economy will grow as they try to be like me. I'm Mitt Romney, and I approve this message.

Think it could work? Cheesy
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,561


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 05, 2012, 01:42:13 AM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

I'm now imagining an ad going something like this:

Success in life is measured by one's wealth. And I am extremely wealthy. I am richer than Obama, richer than you, and richer than all the other candidates combined. I will thus be the most successful president we have ever had. I will inspire our economy to flourish. All the folks out there struggling financially will see me as an inspiration, and our economy will grow as they try to be like me. I'm Mitt Romney, and I approve this message.

Think it could work? Cheesy

You've lost most decent human beings in the first sentence, but losing the decent human being vote doesn't necessarily entail losing the election.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,136
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: March 05, 2012, 11:51:26 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Harper should run that ad.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: March 05, 2012, 03:25:50 PM »
« Edited: March 05, 2012, 03:28:42 PM by Politico »

I will thus be the most successful president we have ever had

He still won't be richer than George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Also, JFK if you count Joe Kennedy's wealth....
Logged
Tidewater_Wave
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: March 05, 2012, 03:32:19 PM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

If your father was a corporate executive, you too can be successful!

Everyone! This ^^ is the exact mentality that is killing our nation faster than Al-Qaida. All over we're being overrun by the negative and lack of motivated mentality that actually believes that we need government to step in and take from some to give to others. "If your father is a corporate executive, you can be successful too!" Tell that to my grandfather who was raised on a farm in Ohio and went on to become Dean of Science and Engineering at a very prestigious college. Tell Bill Clinton that he can't become president because his dad wasn't a corporate exectuive. See this ^^ is the exact type of mentality our children are hearing at school, people are hearing from the media, and undecided voters are exposed to. I believe in America as a society where one creates there own wealth. The liberal from CA who just posted ^^ is proof that Obama's rhetoric is killing our country's spirit and further proof that we need to change what we have in the White House.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: March 05, 2012, 03:44:21 PM »
« Edited: March 05, 2012, 03:46:58 PM by Politico »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

If your father was a corporate executive, you too can be successful!

Everyone! This ^^ is the exact mentality that is killing our nation faster than Al-Qaida. All over we're being overrun by the negative and lack of motivated mentality that actually believes that we need government to step in and take from some to give to others. "If your father is a corporate executive, you can be successful too!" Tell that to my grandfather who was raised on a farm in Ohio and went on to become Dean of Science and Engineering at a very prestigious college. Tell Bill Clinton that he can't become president because his dad wasn't a corporate exectuive. See this ^^ is the exact type of mentality our children are hearing at school, people are hearing from the media, and undecided voters are exposed to. I believe in America as a society where one creates there own wealth. The liberal from CA who just posted ^^ is proof that Obama's rhetoric is killing our country's spirit and further proof that we need to change what we have in the White House.

Yes, and there is a word for this loser mentality: Defeatism. It has always been imported into many parts of America from Europe, but imports are way up thanks to the advent of the Internet and such...
Logged
Tidewater_Wave
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: March 05, 2012, 03:50:08 PM »

How I look at it is that by mentioning his wealth, Romney reminds voters that he has had success in the private sector unlike Obama whose only success has been in government and liberal organizations. By bringing this up often, he makes Obama look like a candidate who is out of touch with what goes on beyond the Washington D.C. ivory tower and ruling class. I don't take it as elitist at all and think it's a great strategy to attract concerned voters who are struggling financially.  They can see Romney as an inspiration.

If your father was a corporate executive, you too can be successful!

Everyone! This ^^ is the exact mentality that is killing our nation faster than Al-Qaida. All over we're being overrun by the negative and lack of motivated mentality that actually believes that we need government to step in and take from some to give to others. "If your father is a corporate executive, you can be successful too!" Tell that to my grandfather who was raised on a farm in Ohio and went on to become Dean of Science and Engineering at a very prestigious college. Tell Bill Clinton that he can't become president because his dad wasn't a corporate exectuive. See this ^^ is the exact type of mentality our children are hearing at school, people are hearing from the media, and undecided voters are exposed to. I believe in America as a society where one creates there own wealth. The liberal from CA who just posted ^^ is proof that Obama's rhetoric is killing our country's spirit and further proof that we need to change what we have in the White House.

Yes, and there is a word for this loser mentality: Defeatism. It has always been imported into many parts of America from Europe, but imports are way up thanks to the advent of the Internet and such...

At least you admit it. Alot of you haven't come that far. Let me know if you would like to take a course in supply-side economics.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 10 queries.