Roy Barnes vs. Bush 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:13:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Roy Barnes vs. Bush 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Roy Barnes vs. Bush 2004  (Read 1848 times)
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« on: February 20, 2012, 02:22:17 AM »
« edited: February 21, 2012, 12:09:41 AM by Jerseyrules »

Don't know much about him, but from what I got from Wikipedia, I think this is possible:

Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2012, 02:23:52 AM »

I think a Southern governor would do better in the south, but he wouldn't be able to hold his defecits in the white-collar north, such as Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2012, 02:24:52 AM »

Which is why I personally subscribe to the "Whistling past Dixie" theory.  Great book, btw.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2012, 10:29:42 PM »

I don't see how Barnes does worse than Kerry in the Rust Belt. Kerry really was about as terrible a candidate for that part of the country as you can get within the Democratic Party mainstream.

In the midwest I can see why you'd think so, but the Massachusetts senator did as good as the Dems will get in the northeast.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2012, 12:05:47 AM »
« Edited: February 21, 2012, 12:10:57 AM by Jerseyrules »

I don't see how Barnes does worse than Kerry in the Rust Belt. Kerry really was about as terrible a candidate for that part of the country as you can get within the Democratic Party mainstream.

In the midwest I can see why you'd think so, but the Massachusetts senator did as good as the Dems will get in the northeast.

Oh, definitely. I see how Barnes loses NH and possibly ME against Bush and how NJ and CN become much closer. It's Barnes losing the PA/OH/MI complex and especially IL that I'm not so sure about.

I was really showing the best case scenario for bush, and IL would be even closer than it was in 1960 if carried by Bush.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2012, 11:03:11 PM »


Better.

Hey, maybe in the distant future, I might write a timeliness based on this scenario. Could I use your map?
I was also thinking about writing a timeline on a Bush vs Barnes scenario. Why Pennsylvania and not Ohio?

Ohio is more populist, which is the group that would've been courted by a southern dem governor.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2012, 02:09:53 AM »


Better.

Hey, maybe in the distant future, I might write a timeliness based on this scenario. Could I use your map?
I was also thinking about writing a timeline on a Bush vs Barnes scenario. Why Pennsylvania and not Ohio?

Ohio is more populist, which is the group that would've been courted by a southern dem governor.

Okay. What about Georgia? Is it solidly in Barnes's column?

Depends on if W. runs his campaign the same as otl and how Barnes runs his.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.