Official NH Primary Results Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:09:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Official NH Primary Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26
Author Topic: Official NH Primary Results Thread  (Read 44179 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #550 on: January 10, 2012, 11:45:16 PM »


No, he won 1 precinct out of 5 in Keene.
Logged
Shilly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 590
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #551 on: January 10, 2012, 11:45:34 PM »

I don't think Romney will break 40. At a glance, what's left seems like mostly a wash, maybe slightly unfavorable for him.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,760


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #552 on: January 10, 2012, 11:45:49 PM »


You're right. I didn't see that.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #553 on: January 10, 2012, 11:47:09 PM »

I said Romney would get 40%, because I didn't change my prediction in time Sad I wanted to change it to 30%+.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,760


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #554 on: January 10, 2012, 11:48:48 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2012, 11:52:55 PM by realisticidealist »

Back down to 39% on CNN.

EDIT:Romney at 39.3% overall.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #555 on: January 10, 2012, 11:53:43 PM »

Licthfield and Danville are still out, but Romney should be at 16 points ahead of Paul.
Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #556 on: January 11, 2012, 12:00:58 AM »

It annoys me that MSNBC still has Bachmann listed on TV in the results tab.

I imagine she's still on the ballot.

True, but so are a bunch of other candidates that aren't on the screen. Roemer will probably get more votes than her.

Doubtful; I'm betting she even ends up polling better than Perry. She's the only high-name recognition candidate anywhere near the top of the ballot (besides Cain I guess, but he's been out of the race for a lot longer).

Roemer - 876 votes
Bachmann - 325 votes

Just sayin' Wink
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #557 on: January 11, 2012, 12:05:40 AM »

It annoys me that MSNBC still has Bachmann listed on TV in the results tab.

I imagine she's still on the ballot.

True, but so are a bunch of other candidates that aren't on the screen. Roemer will probably get more votes than her.

Doubtful; I'm betting she even ends up polling better than Perry. She's the only high-name recognition candidate anywhere near the top of the ballot (besides Cain I guess, but he's been out of the race for a lot longer).

Roemer - 876 votes
Bachmann - 325 votes

Just sayin' Wink

Tongue
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,299


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #558 on: January 11, 2012, 12:14:22 AM »

Looking at the results, the counties, and the demographics:

-The Paul "College Town Kids" didn't show up in large numbers in college towns, which instead were owned by the "Rich Old Men" also found in college towns and went to Huntsman and Romney instead.

-However, Paul made up for it with the mountain men (in the north), the hobos (lower class, mostly in the area surrounding Concord explaining the small pockets in otherwise safe Romney territory, and the Paul green cutting a swath through Romney yellow in the northwest), the anarchists/weed smokers (the southwest area near Keene, Roxbury and Winchester for example), and the political Free Staters (helping around Concord).

-Huntsman, as I brilliantly predicted before the results started coming in, underperformed majorly. This can be explained by two things; first, his ground level support (both from his main campaign and his "grassroots") was basically nonexistent. From what I've heard, a lot of undecided folks were watching CNN (which, were you watching it throughout the day, was basically engaging in HUNTSMAN FANCLUB DAY) and were going to vote Huntsman, but then saw that he had no overt supporters and went to Romney/Paul instead. Also, Santorum had about a week of "SANTORUM SURGING" while Huntsman had a day or so.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #559 on: January 11, 2012, 12:15:19 AM »

Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #560 on: January 11, 2012, 12:26:59 AM »

I'm laughing at all the comments early on tonight saying tonight was a failure for Romney, saying that when he was at 34% and led Paul by 9-10. Now he's hovering around 40%, the spot they were criticizing him for not reach, and leads Paul by 17-18. Curious to see if they still think tonight was a failure for Romney.

BTW. Great maps Homely! Smiley
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,760


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #561 on: January 11, 2012, 12:27:50 AM »

Worst Obama town: Farmington (Strafford County)

Obama 54%
Write-ins 32%
Vermin Supreme 2%
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #562 on: January 11, 2012, 12:28:29 AM »

Tonight was completely unremarkable for Romney, just like most nights in his public life (not Iowa, though; that was a relative triumph).
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #563 on: January 11, 2012, 12:28:44 AM »
« Edited: January 11, 2012, 12:31:19 AM by J. J. »

Goffston and one precinct in Portsmouth are still out as well.

Gilmanton as well.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #564 on: January 11, 2012, 12:32:03 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #565 on: January 11, 2012, 12:32:35 AM »

Tonight was completely unremarkable for Romney, just like most nights in his public life (not Iowa, though; that was a relative triumph).
Sure, Romney didn't blow anyone away, but it certainly wasn't a failure either. He'll be getting momentum from this, its just a matter of it will be enough to withstand Newt Gingrichs suicide mission to take him down.

Its hard to completely wipe everyone out in a state when the airwaves are filled with anti-Romney ads and there were many attacks in the final debate.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #566 on: January 11, 2012, 12:35:04 AM »

Tonight was completely unremarkable for Romney, just like most nights in his public life (not Iowa, though; that was a relative triumph).
Sure, Romney didn't blow anyone away, but it certainly wasn't a failure either.

That's what I meant. Unremarkable.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #567 on: January 11, 2012, 12:37:34 AM »

FWIW I saw a ton of Romney ads and about a third as many Huntsman ads (all from his PAC), and no ads from anyone else.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #568 on: January 11, 2012, 12:38:30 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,063


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #569 on: January 11, 2012, 12:39:08 AM »

Romney got 40% of the vote. How does that hurt him? And what argument do Newt and Rick Santorum have to defeat him after finishing 4th and 5th in NH? It isn't like those were startling finishing that would catapult him to victory.

This race is over. Newt and Rick will not beat Romney in SC barring a scandal breaking. It won't be a blowout, but he will win by 5-10%. Like I said, the upstate evangelicals no longer have the numbers to offset the low country and coastal vote like they once did.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,760


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #570 on: January 11, 2012, 12:44:56 AM »

Other than one Portsmouth precinct, Romney's stronghold is tapped out.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #571 on: January 11, 2012, 12:47:23 AM »

Also, to the political junkie, this may not have been a great win for Romney. But to the average GOP voter, they're going to wake up tomorrow, read their paper and see Romney easily carried NH, and think "Okay, he's going to be our nominee. I support him." An underwhelming performance could have put everything at risk. Instead, Mitt stayed solid, and did what needed to be done. Now, barring something crazy, he'll slip through SC, take Florida, and the nomination will be his.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #572 on: January 11, 2012, 12:49:26 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

Better than Bush got in 2004.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #573 on: January 11, 2012, 12:51:20 AM »

Litchfield just reported, Romney at 39.4, +16.6.  Gingrich ahead by 157, so the gap closed a bit.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #574 on: January 11, 2012, 12:52:04 AM »

FWIW I saw a ton of Romney ads and about a third as many Huntsman ads (all from his PAC), and no ads from anyone else.

How much of New Hampshire is in the Boston market?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 13 queries.