Official NH Primary Results Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2021, 07:39:03 PM

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Official NH Primary Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26
Author Topic: Official NH Primary Results Thread  (Read 41327 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #575 on: January 11, 2012, 12:52:45 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

only one incumbent has done better than 85%. Reagan got 86% in 1984.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,912
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #576 on: January 11, 2012, 12:52:56 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

Better than Bush got in 2004.

And that was a close election.  Obama is still in decline; Bush holding to improving.
Logged
PR
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,031
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #577 on: January 11, 2012, 12:53:03 AM »

Whoa, Gingrich beat Santorum? lol
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,912
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #578 on: January 11, 2012, 12:54:03 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

only one incumbent has done better than 85%. Reagan got 86% in 1984.

And that was a landslide. 
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,124
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #579 on: January 11, 2012, 12:57:11 AM »

Just eyeballing it it looks like Santorum was the candidate whose pattern of support was most correlated with Paul's...
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,564


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #580 on: January 11, 2012, 01:06:33 AM »

How much of New Hampshire is in the Boston market?

All of the most populated counties in the southern part of the state are in the Boston TV market.  A few counties along the Connecticut River are in the Burlington-Plattsburgh TV market.  A few counties along the Maine border in northern New Hampshire are in the Portland, Maine TV market.
Logged
Dr. RI, Trustbuster
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,012
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #581 on: January 11, 2012, 01:09:29 AM »

So...are they going to finish reporting tonight?
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #582 on: January 11, 2012, 01:09:40 AM »

From Politico.com:

M Romney   94,252   39.4%
R Paul  54,511   22.8%
J Huntsman   40,388   16.9%
N Gingrich   22,518   9.4%
R Santorum   22,292   9.3%
R Perry  1,668   0.7%
B Roemer   898   0.4%
M Bachmann  341  0.1%
F Karger   331   0.1%
K Rubash  246   0.1%
G Johnson  175  0.1%
H Cain 148  0.1%
J Lawman  122  0.1%
C Hill  103   0.0%
B Linn   82   0.0%
M Meehan  46  0.0%
J  Story   39  0.0%
K Drummond  35  0.0%
B Betzler  29  0.0%
J Robinson  26 0.0%
S Greenleaf  22  0.0%
M Callahan  18  0.0%
L Swift  17 0.0%
A Martin 16  0.0%
V Weuensche 15 0.0%
T Brewer  14 0.0%
J Davis  13  0.0%
R Crow  12 0.0%
J Vestermark  2 0.0%
H Cort  2 0.0%
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 49,532


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #583 on: January 11, 2012, 01:18:35 AM »

Romney got 40%? How lame. I was hoping that a Romney would get 2nd place in NH for a 3rd time. Looks like Santorum got 5th place with 9%, so much for that Santorum surge.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,700
Ireland, Republic of
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #584 on: January 11, 2012, 01:21:40 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

only one incumbent has done better than 85%. Reagan got 86% in 1984.

And that was a landslide. 

...

Are you seriously trying to extrapolate meaningful conclusions from a primary that about six people voted in?

Clinton got 84% in 1996, Bush got 80% in 2000. Given the very small amount of people bothering to vote in totally uncompetitive primaries, those figures are pretty much the same. As is Obama's, what, 82%? Nothing to see here.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #585 on: January 11, 2012, 01:22:03 AM »

So...are they going to finish reporting tonight?

probably not. They'll wrap it up by Thursday and certify.

Previous incumbents who weren't seriously contested

Obama: 81.45% at the moment
Bush 79.8%
Clinton 84.4%
Reagan 86.1%

Nixon won 67.6% v. incumbent Congressmen.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,090
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.77, S: -2.09

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #586 on: January 11, 2012, 01:55:44 AM »

Dailykos founder Tweeted "GOP enthusiasm gap: 185,000 voted tonight, compared to 240,000 in 2008"  According to the AP, with 95% reporting as of now, 242,917 voted in the GOP primary...
Logged
emotional hardcore
BRTD
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 94,433
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #587 on: January 11, 2012, 02:11:36 AM »

So about equal despite the fact that it was the only contested primary as opposed to 2008 when independents were splitting between it and the Democratic one? That isn't too impressive.
Logged
rebeltarian
rebel_libertarian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 286


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #588 on: January 11, 2012, 02:19:06 AM »

Well, that was fun.  Nice silver medal for RP.  Now it's onto South Carolina and even more fun!  I can't wait to see the 2 Ricks bust out the socially conservative rhetoric and tear up the liberal Romney.  Santorum's especially got the resume to fire up the fundies, this is gonna be some good stuff.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,182
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #589 on: January 11, 2012, 02:45:27 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

only one incumbent has done better than 85%. Reagan got 86% in 1984.

And that was a landslide. 

...

Are you seriously trying to extrapolate meaningful conclusions from a primary that about six people voted in?


Hey, it'not like this is the most stupid thing JJ has ever done.
Logged
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,230
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #590 on: January 11, 2012, 06:35:03 AM »

Who is Ed Cowan?
Logged
Colbert
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #591 on: January 11, 2012, 06:56:06 AM »

From Politico.com:

M Romney   94,252   39.4%
R Paul  54,511   22.8%
J Huntsman   40,388   16.9%
N Gingrich   22,518   9.4%
R Santorum   22,292   9.3%
R Perry  1,668   0.7%



after iowa and nouveau-hampshire, the conclusion is simple : ron paul is the only solid opposant to mormon victory.

Perry is definitively down. How he dare to continue after 0.7% in NH???
Logged
KEmperor
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,456
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #592 on: January 11, 2012, 07:27:51 AM »

FWIW I saw a ton of Romney ads and about a third as many Huntsman ads (all from his PAC), and no ads from anyone else.

How much of New Hampshire is in the Boston market?

Depends on how big the eating area is.
Logged
The_Texas_Libertarian
TXMichael
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 827
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #593 on: January 11, 2012, 09:57:22 AM »

The far right wing really took a pounding in NH.  Both Gingrich and Santorum didn't even get enough votes to receive a single delegate and Perry did poorly
Logged
The_Texas_Libertarian
TXMichael
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 827
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #594 on: January 11, 2012, 09:58:55 AM »

Although this may be good for the GOP in the fall.  If they can pull NH away from the Dems that would be significant even at just 4 electoral votes
Logged
homelycooking
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,299
Belize


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #595 on: January 11, 2012, 10:06:34 AM »

Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,912
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #596 on: January 11, 2012, 10:47:04 AM »

Getting 39% of the vote after running for six straight years in what is basically your home state against a bunch of candidates who basically don't have any campaigns at all is pathetic. Sorry Mittbots.

Getting less than 85% against candidates including Vermin Supreme is your definition of good?

only one incumbent has done better than 85%. Reagan got 86% in 1984.

And that was a landslide. 

...

Are you seriously trying to extrapolate meaningful conclusions from a primary that about six people voted in?

Clinton got 84% in 1996, Bush got 80% in 2000. Given the very small amount of people bothering to vote in totally uncompetitive primaries, those figures are pretty much the same. As is Obama's, what, 82%? Nothing to see here.

Not a sign of strength for Obama; it is not a sign of disaster, either.  If you look at the two of those within range, Clinton and Bush II, you are looking at 49% and 51% of the vote.  Obama is a candidate that is weakening, as compared to 2008.  Weakening is not the same as losing.

Romney showed a great deal of strength here, not only winning, doing it with a fairly large margin, easily above 15 points and a with a better turnout than 2008.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,274
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #597 on: January 11, 2012, 01:23:59 PM »

loljj
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,645


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #598 on: January 11, 2012, 01:38:05 PM »

Santorum only down 46 votes with two precincts left to report.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 39,553
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #599 on: January 11, 2012, 02:12:43 PM »

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 13 queries.