Who do you think will be the Republican nominee?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:15:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Who do you think will be the Republican nominee?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who do you think will be the Republican nominee?
#1
Mitt Romney.
 
#2
Not Mitt Romney.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: Who do you think will be the Republican nominee?  (Read 3081 times)
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 07, 2012, 11:06:08 PM »
« edited: January 07, 2012, 11:07:54 PM by Oakvale »

I'm going to go out on a limb and say Mitt Romney.

It's ridiculous that the most obvious paper tiger since Ed Muskie is apparently going to cruise to the nomination, maybe even carry all fifty states, while being disliked by a large majority of the party and never cracking 30% in the national polls, but that's seemingly where we are.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2012, 11:09:57 PM »

I'm not really entirely sure how the Republican nominating contest turned out to be so full of losers and incompetents that a weird, unlikeable, flip-flopping Mormon who passed state-level Obamacare went on to win all fifty states.

But like you said, that's where we are.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2012, 11:18:38 PM »

I'm not really entirely sure how the Republican nominating contest turned out to be so full of losers and incompetents that a weird, unlikeable, flip-flopping Mormon who passed state-level Obamacare went on to win all fifty states.

But like you said, that's where we are.

Yeah, it's a perfect storm of incompetence that's somehow lead to a Romney coronation. If virtually any of the hyped potential candidates who declined to run (bar Palin, I guess) had jumped in they'd have mopped the floor with Romney and we'd be talking about Thune or whoever. Hilarious.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2012, 11:31:41 PM »

Romney. Never doubted it.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2012, 11:33:25 PM »

not not Mitt Romney
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2012, 11:35:23 PM »

Romney unfortunately... but he will have my vote in the general election
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2012, 11:40:02 PM »

I'm going to go out on a limb and say Mitt Romney.

It's ridiculous that the most obvious paper tiger since Ed Muskie is apparently going to cruise to the nomination, maybe even carry all fifty states, while being disliked by a large majority of the party and never cracking 30% in the national polls, but that's seemingly where we are.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2012, 11:42:55 PM »

The only opinion that matters on this matter is the opinion of the jmfcsts. Is it finally a done deal?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2012, 11:43:10 PM »

MITT ROMNEY WILL BE THE NOMINEE. Can you say about time he's  been running for 5years. He wants it bad and conservatives don't want to give it to him and they don't trust him. But he's leading in all the polls and no true conservative and match him dollar 4 dollar.
Amen!
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2012, 11:43:24 PM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2012, 11:45:59 PM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2012, 11:49:44 PM »

For what it's worth, while I think Romney's a lock for the nomination, I don't think he'll win in November. Or even that it will be particularly close.

But, really, Newt, you couldn't even try to run a competent campaign? All it would have taken is winning Iowa and then South Carolina on the ensuing momentum.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2012, 11:50:44 PM »

Disciplined Newt Gingrich? That's a contradiction.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2012, 11:52:28 PM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.
You never understood why Reagan fundamentally ed up the country.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2012, 12:55:12 AM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.
You never understood why Reagan fundamentally ed up the country.

Liberal myth. What we're doing right now shows you what type of progress we've had in the past thirty years. Look around your place at all of the innovations that have made your life more comfortable than things were in 1980.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,740


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2012, 01:23:56 AM »

Obama will be sad that after all his sucking up to Wall Street, they're just going to support nominee Mitt Romney.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2012, 01:29:59 AM »

Mitt Romney is going to lose handily. He's an awful candidate.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,423


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2012, 01:30:55 AM »
« Edited: January 08, 2012, 01:33:07 AM by Nathan »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.

To understand Reagan was not to accept him and to accept Reagan was not to understand him.

Liberal myth. What we're doing right now shows you what type of progress we've had in the past thirty years. Look around your place at all of the innovations that have made your life more comfortable than things were in 1980.

Name any thirty-year period of history in the past three or four centuries of which this has not been true. The technological sector and the economy as a whole aren't always the same story (indeed, technology, in terms of what was being made if not what was most widely available, was advancing at a fairly rapid pace during the Great Depression). Material was void; void, material. The Reagan boom was not real. We realized that around 2007.

Oh, and also:

I'm going to go out on a limb and say Mitt Romney.

It's ridiculous that the most obvious paper tiger since Ed Muskie is apparently going to cruise to the nomination, maybe even carry all fifty states, while being disliked by a large majority of the party and never cracking 30% in the national polls, but that's seemingly where we are.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2012, 01:56:47 AM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.
You never understood why Reagan fundamentally ed up the country.

Liberal myth. What we're doing right now shows you what type of progress we've had in the past thirty years. Look around your place at all of the innovations that have made your life more comfortable than things were in 1980.
Yes, yes Reagan is responsible for every single one of them.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,268
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2012, 02:02:09 AM »

Romney, unfortunately, is all but locked in at this point. At least Obama will beat him like how Bush beat Kerry (and for similar reasons) and we can be free of him forevermore.

Actually, Romney is going to be the new Reagan who drives your ilk crazy for eight long, prosperous years. You'll never understand or accept it just like you never understood or accepted Reagan.
You never understood why Reagan fundamentally ed up the country.

Liberal myth. What we're doing right now shows you what type of progress we've had in the past thirty years. Look around your place at all of the innovations that have made your life more comfortable than things were in 1980.



He was a great man.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2012, 01:07:50 PM »

To be fair, one of those toy ads eventually led to a show which was a good 22 minute toy ad. Tongue
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,175
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2012, 01:13:17 PM »

Romney, most probably.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2012, 01:14:46 PM »

Romney, due to the unwillingness of Gingrich and Perry to drop out and endorse Santorum.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2012, 01:48:58 PM »

I'd really love to know the reasoning of those who've voted "not Mitt Romney". I mean, I'm not thrilled about it, but I don't see how anyone but Romney ends up winning the nomination at this point.
Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2012, 02:18:36 PM »

Romney will win. That's become quiet clear. I suppose he could still lose SC but that would just delay the inevitable. Santorum just doesn't have the campaign infrastructure to compete and Newt/Perry are becoming increasingly irrelevant. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 15 queries.