4.86% Swing in 2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:37:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  4.86% Swing in 2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 4.86% Swing in 2012  (Read 3530 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« on: October 30, 2011, 10:37:05 PM »

According to Leip's swing data for 2008, voters swung to the Democratic Party by 9.73%.  The below scenario assumes a half-back swing; 4.86%.  The 4.86% has been distributed evenly, subtracted from Obama and added to the Republican in all 50 state + D.C.  As you can see, that produces a very tight election. 



Republican:280
Democrat:258

States with a 1% Margin
Colorado
Iowa
Minnesota
Pennsylvania
New Hampshire

Didn't Colorado vote for Obama by a larger margin than the country as a whole? And I'm pretty sure VA was close enough to still stay Democratic as in your scenario Obama wins the popular vote by about 2 points.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2011, 09:03:16 AM »

virginia = 6.3, so no(4.86*2>6.3). Iowa and NH on other hand would be a really close states. Based on regional trends I would say that CO and IA would stay democratic though. But I really doubt the swing would be this big, because of the demographic change, it would be somewhere between 3-4%.

I thought that is what he was trying to do, but in that case there wasn't a 9% swing to the Democrats in 2008. It was more 9.5/2= 4.25.

In any case this map makes sense, only NV and WI would probably flip as well. And there is a chance IA or CO might not.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2011, 06:24:29 PM »

^ That would be a full swing. You said it was a half-swing initially.

A half-swing to the Republicans would be: 9.72/2=4.86. Subtract 4.86 from the D margin in 2008 (7.26-4.86=2.40).

So a "half" swing back to the Republicans would result in a D +2.40 election.

Does slicing off 4.86 from Obama and adding 4.86 to McCain result in this margin? No,  it results in R + 2.45. Which is  the 2004 margin, meaning it's just a full reverse swing.

I think that's the source of confusion, at least. I don't know really know what you were trying to do.
^^^
Yup, that's what confused me. You basically reverted back to 2004, when I thought you were trying to say you were going halfway between 2004 and 2008.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2011, 08:05:01 PM »

A half swing equals an Obama win, which doesn't add up to his approval rating of 45%.  No president in the history of US presidential elections has ever won with a disapproval rating almost 10 points above approval.

The first map makes sense.

Yes, according to current approval ratings, Obama would lose by about 4-5 points to Romney. Would probably be about even with the rest of the crew though, even an Obama win. Though if the economy continues to make about 100-200k jobs on average till next year, and the unemployment rate is near 8.5%, he could get re-elected. What happens in Europe basically determines what happens to Obama.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2011, 08:06:40 PM »

Here is a 1 and 1/2 swing (7.29%).



Obama 212
Republican 326

I would think a Romney vs Obama map would look a lot like this currently, though Obama wins MN.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2011, 05:44:14 AM »

Here is a 1 and 1/2 swing (7.29%).



Obama 212
Republican 326
This would require 2010 wave again. Not going to happen.

With the exception of MN, you won't need that high of a margin to get this result. 4-5 points Republican should do it. A 7 point Republican win, like in 2010, would lead to MI and NM flipping and NJ, OR and WA being pretty close.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2011, 05:36:50 PM »

Uniform swings = Laziness. Though its true of course that it would be some hard work in seeing the swingability of every state.

Very true, but it's almost ridiculous to try to predict now how the states will swing. Some we do have an idea though. NH will be trending Republican in 2012. WI and MI too probably, but that's only because Obama did so ridiculously well there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.