Next BIG Swing State?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:39:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Next BIG Swing State?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: What state has the potential to become the BIG state in 2008?
#1
Wisconsin
 
#2
Iowa
 
#3
New Mexico
 
#4
Nevada
 
#5
Pennsylvania
 
#6
Virginia
 
#7
Colorado
 
#8
Florida....again....
 
#9
Ohio....again....
 
#10
Other(Please state)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 85

Author Topic: Next BIG Swing State?  (Read 8839 times)
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 20, 2004, 07:12:40 PM »

Although I would think that it's pretty impossible to tell now what states do you think will be the big states in future elections(such as Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004)?

Even though it won't matter anyway because we have know idea who the candidates will be it's interesting to think about.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2004, 07:13:54 PM »

California
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2004, 07:14:55 PM »

PA

1996 - Clinton by 9

2000 - Gore by 5

2004 - Kerry by 2.5

2008 - BIG swing state
Logged
George W. Bush
eversole_Adam
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 906


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2004, 07:18:08 PM »

PA

1996 - Clinton by 9

2000 - Gore by 5

2004 - Kerry by 2.5

2008 - BIG swing state

Thats my vote.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2004, 07:19:32 PM »

Well if PA is the next big swing state we better make sure that Rendell doesn't run Tongue
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2004, 07:21:48 PM »

I think Nevada will be closest in 2008, but it isn't quite "big."

Pennsylvania earns my vote. Florida and Ohio will probably be pro-Republican by about 1.5, although Ohio depends on the economy, heavily.

Pennsylvania should be about Democrat 0.5.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2004, 07:25:30 PM »

Well if PA is the next big swing state we better make sure that Rendell doesn't run Tongue

He has already stated that if re-elected he will serve his full term meaning no 2008 run.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2004, 07:41:49 PM »

Well if PA is the next big swing state we better make sure that Rendell doesn't run Tongue

He has already stated that if re-elected he will serve his full term meaning no 2008 run.

Clinton also said that when he was re-elected in Arkansas Wink
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2004, 07:55:15 PM »

PA seems to just be going Democratic +5 from the popular vote. I don't see any significant trend. However, it depends on the candidates.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2004, 07:57:24 PM »

Well if PA is the next big swing state we better make sure that Rendell doesn't run Tongue

He has already stated that if re-elected he will serve his full term meaning no 2008 run.

Clinton also said that when he was re-elected in Arkansas Wink

Rendell would have to start gearing up for a race in early 2007 and the voters would relize that he broke his promise. Wouldn't be a smart move.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2004, 08:05:25 PM »

I voted Virginia, but it's really a tie between it and Pennsylvania.  I think if the Democrat's nominate a populist or a moderate, it won't be a swing state, even if Ohio is.  However, Virginia is trending towards swing state.  Even as LIBERAL Kerry did worse than MODERATE Gore in liberal states like Maryland, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, he kept the same margin in Virginia.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,948
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2004, 08:11:29 PM »

In all honesty, I don't think it matters since I don't think 2008 will be a close race. I don't know who'll win, but it'll be a clear victory either way.

why? When's the last time we had 3 close races in a row? not since 1884-1892, and that had the same Democrat running all 3 times, and the same Republican twice of those times. The patterns just aren't there. 2 close elections in a row is actually very rare. 2008 will be a clear victory, either way.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,719
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2004, 08:16:27 PM »

Colorado.

It isn't too big, but it's getting much closer than it was.

Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2004, 08:18:05 PM »

Colorado has barely moved. The only reason it wasn't close in 2000 is that Nader got 5.25% of the vote.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2004, 08:41:39 PM »

The only "big" states there are Pennsylvania, Florida and Ohio. And Ohio lost a gazillion jobs this cycle.

It's Florida or bust for the Democrats.
Logged
Hitchabrut
republicanjew18
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674


Political Matrix
E: 8.38, S: 7.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2004, 08:54:44 PM »

Pennsylvania, maybe Virginia or Colorado, the whole upper midwest, hoping for New Jersey

Didn't vote - unsure
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2004, 09:24:22 PM »

Depends on the candidates.  But I echo what BTRD said, 2008 will probably be like 1988, a semi-landslide either way.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2004, 09:31:30 PM »


I abolutely agree and I think that the repubs will take it next time, too!
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2004, 09:33:45 PM »


I abolutely agree and I think that the repubs will take it next time, too!

Wow, uh, why?
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2004, 11:54:17 PM »

Pennsylvania is the ultimate swing state. And it's not trending Republican, it's just following the national average. Clinton > Gore > Kerry.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2004, 04:49:09 PM »


b/c of Ahnold, the (ever so slight) Republican trend, and the fact that polls taken before the election showed the race tighter there than in the end (ie, in Sep. and Aug., good months for Bush, Kerry was only up by a few points in many polls).
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2004, 05:21:39 PM »


b/c of Ahnold, the (ever so slight) Republican trend, and the fact that polls taken before the election showed the race tighter there than in the end (ie, in Sep. and Aug., good months for Bush, Kerry was only up by a few points in many polls).

That is very much ever-so-slight. Polls also showed it close in New York and tied in Maryland. Polls sometimes suck, and I think this was one of those cases. The final results are much more telling.
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2004, 07:27:20 PM »

Kerry won California by a million votes. He was a weak candidate and lost the general election by nearly 3%. Barring something major, that will be impossible for Republicans to overcome in the near future.
Logged
jacob_101
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 647


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 22, 2004, 02:27:27 PM »

Depends on who is running, but if it's a conservative vs. a liberal, I would say there the new swing state would be CO.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 22, 2004, 03:29:39 PM »

Colorado for sure
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 13 queries.