Blue state turning red
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:51:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Blue state turning red
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Which blue state is the most likely to turn red?
#1
California
#2
Connecticut
#3
D.C.
#4
Delaware
#5
Hawaii
#6
Illinois
#7
Maine
#8
Maryland
#9
Massachusetts
#10
Michigan
#11
Minnesota
#12
New Jersey
#13
New York
#14
Oregon
#15
Pennsylvania
#16
Rhode Island
#17
Vermont
#18
Washington
#19
Wisconsin
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Blue state turning red  (Read 11836 times)
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2011, 03:06:16 PM »

I voted Wisconsin, clearly the trends will benefit the REP in another 10 years or so.  2nd choice, I picked Oregon, but the west part of the state (Portland area) will prevent that from happening anytime soon. That will counter balance east Oregon which votes much like Idaho.

You do realize Eastern Oregon contains 20% (or less depending on which counties you count) of the state population right? Most of those counties have flat/negative population growth and high unemployment rates. There's not a single city out there with more than 20,000 people in it.

Wait till gas prices hit $6/gallon. Eastern Oregon is dead.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2011, 05:08:17 AM »

I voted Wisconsin, clearly the trends will benefit the REP in another 10 years or so.  2nd choice, I picked Oregon, but the west part of the state (Portland area) will prevent that from happening anytime soon. That will counter balance east Oregon which votes much like Idaho.

You do realize Eastern Oregon contains 20% (or less depending on which counties you count) of the state population right? Most of those counties have flat/negative population growth and high unemployment rates. There's not a single city out there with more than 20,000 people in it.

Wait till gas prices hit $6/gallon. Eastern Oregon is dead.
I think the bigger problem is the emerging population center there(Bend) is already tied politically without much of a minority presence. It makes sense that it would become even more democratic if it keeps growing. If you compare it to big cities in Eastern Washington that are large and still growing, they are either Republican strongholds(Tri-cities), a lot larger(Spokane), or dominated by minorities(Yakima).
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2011, 02:09:34 PM »

I voted Wisconsin, clearly the trends will benefit the REP in another 10 years or so.  2nd choice, I picked Oregon, but the west part of the state (Portland area) will prevent that from happening anytime soon. That will counter balance east Oregon which votes much like Idaho.

You do realize Eastern Oregon contains 20% (or less depending on which counties you count) of the state population right? Most of those counties have flat/negative population growth and high unemployment rates. There's not a single city out there with more than 20,000 people in it.

Wait till gas prices hit $6/gallon. Eastern Oregon is dead.
I think the bigger problem is the emerging population center there(Bend) is already tied politically without much of a minority presence. It makes sense that it would become even more democratic if it keeps growing. If you compare it to big cities in Eastern Washington that are large and still growing, they are either Republican strongholds(Tri-cities), a lot larger(Spokane), or dominated by minorities(Yakima).

While Bend is growing and is in Deschutes County (Deschutes County is in Central Oregon (basically Eastern Oregon-lite) and is the fastest growing county in Oregon: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deschutes_County,_Oregon#Demographics), I don't think it will be a problem.

I think the city is going to top off at about ~175/225k people and become a swingish city. Kind of like Spokane, WA.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 13, 2011, 05:58:39 PM »

I voted Wisconsin, clearly the trends will benefit the REP in another 10 years or so.  2nd choice, I picked Oregon, but the west part of the state (Portland area) will prevent that from happening anytime soon. That will counter balance east Oregon which votes much like Idaho.

You do realize Eastern Oregon contains 20% (or less depending on which counties you count) of the state population right? Most of those counties have flat/negative population growth and high unemployment rates. There's not a single city out there with more than 20,000 people in it.

Wait till gas prices hit $6/gallon. Eastern Oregon is dead.
I think the bigger problem is the emerging population center there(Bend) is already tied politically without much of a minority presence. It makes sense that it would become even more democratic if it keeps growing. If you compare it to big cities in Eastern Washington that are large and still growing, they are either Republican strongholds(Tri-cities), a lot larger(Spokane), or dominated by minorities(Yakima).

While Bend is growing and is in Deschutes County (Deschutes County is in Central Oregon (basically Eastern Oregon-lite) and is the fastest growing county in Oregon: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deschutes_County,_Oregon#Demographics), I don't think it will be a problem.

I think the city is going to top off at about ~175/225k people and become a swingish city. Kind of like Spokane, WA.
Spokane metro is 600k, and only recently did Spokane county become swing. Bend is getting there with about 200k. Only other place in Eastern PNW that could do that is probably Yakima because it's majority hispanic(soon).
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 14, 2011, 03:34:26 PM »

i don't see why everyone is saying Wisconsin. Let's accept it for what it is: a swing, maybe slight blue state similar to New Mexico. 2010 was just an abnormally bad year. The state will always have somewhat of a progressive tradition, largely due to the Scandinavian population. After all, this is where the Charles LaFollettes and Gaylord Nelsons of the world came from.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 14, 2011, 08:25:53 PM »

i don't see why everyone is saying Wisconsin. Let's accept it for what it is: a swing, maybe slight blue state similar to New Mexico. 2010 was just an abnormally bad year. The state will always have somewhat of a progressive tradition, largely due to the Scandinavian population. After all, this is where the Charles LaFollettes and Gaylord Nelsons of the world came from.

Kansas had a progressive tradition once.

Also, it's impossible for every state to trend Democratic. Some states have to trending Republican, and Wisconsin seems like a logical choice.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 18, 2011, 05:40:07 PM »

Why is Michigan doing so poorly in this poll?  The factors in place now are awfully similar to western PA circa 1980s->present.  Michigan would be my choice FAR more than PA.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 14 queries.