Washington State Recount, Part Deux (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:17:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington State Recount, Part Deux (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Washington State Recount, Part Deux  (Read 24878 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: December 15, 2004, 11:50:53 PM »

The Democrats will "find" enough votes to win.  I applaud them for it. 

I also applaud them for managing to convince enough idiot voters in Washington State that they're not cheating.

I mean, really, Republicans are just not very good at cheating or stealing elections.  When they steal elections, they win by way too many votes for it to be rational discerned that they stole the election. 

They really need to start "finding votes" when these margins get closer, so they can start claiming that "every vote needs to be counted."

Maybe then, and only then, they'll start winning the dumb voters.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2004, 05:05:34 PM »

There is a difference between finding extra votes that were not counted by the machine and finding extra ballots that were never put into the machines to be counted.

The most amazing thing is that, despite several officials looking, the same person finds each and every new, never before seen ballot.

Answer me this:  If Bush lost Ohio by 42 votes and Karl Rove kept finding new ballots would you think that was normal or would you be on here screaming bloody murder?

Something is not right here.  Whether it is willful fraud or gross incompetence something is not right.

Simply put, there is a roll of who shows up to vote.  This gives us a total number of ballots that were filled out.  After the first machine count the discrepency between the number of ballots cast and the number of ballots fed to the machine should have been noticed.  There should be a record of this somewhere.  At that moment King County should have begun looking for the missing ballots, if there are any ballots that were legitimately not put into the counting machine..

Exactly.  Couldn't say it better myself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.