why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:36:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits?  (Read 844 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


« on: May 26, 2011, 05:26:10 PM »

Perhaps because even before Al Gore invented the Internet, voters weren't stupid or living in a bubble.  They might get fooled by a Conservative-in-Name-Only once, but once the CINO's record became clear, he'd be primaried by an actual Conservative Democrat and lose the primary?  They did have things like newspapers, TV and letters to the editor in those days, you know?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2011, 06:34:19 PM »

The republicans did this in Illinois. There was a district based in Lake County that was heavily republican but was mostly moderate to liberal Chuck Percy type republicans. Yet they would vote for ted bundy if it had an R next to its name. In 1969, they voted in archconservative Phil Crane. It took the voters 35 years to realize that a nutcase was representing them.

First of all, Phil Crane might have been conservative, but he was no "nutcase".  I am sick and tired of you so-called "progressives" labeling those with whom you disagree as "nutcases", while idolizing far-lefties like Alan Grayson and Pete Stark.   Either all on the ideological extremes are "nutcases" or none are.  Second, Illinois suburbanites were far more conservative in the 1970s and 1980s than they are today.  And when the district started to trend more liberal in the 1990s, Crane DID face primaries from moderates - and won those races.  So it's not like his constituents didn't have a choice.  Third, you know who Phil Crane succeeded as Congressman?  Donald Rumsfeld.  That should tell you everything you need to know about Crane's district in 1969.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.