PC Party, 1993 - Disaster Averted (Canada) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:40:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  PC Party, 1993 - Disaster Averted (Canada) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PC Party, 1993 - Disaster Averted (Canada)  (Read 12131 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« on: December 21, 2011, 07:53:01 AM »

I'm reading it.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2011, 09:06:33 AM »
« Edited: December 28, 2011, 09:17:42 AM by Nathan »

Wait...so if the fourth region is limited to BC and Alberta, where are the Saskatchewan and Manitoba senators coming from exactly? Am I misinterpreting the way the regions work?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2012, 11:43:38 PM »

Oh, I see! I simply didn't realize that there were non-regional Senators (I thought that Newfoundland and Labrador were in the Maritime region and the Arctic was in the Western region). Thank you for correcting my understanding.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2012, 08:20:45 AM »

Wait, what exactly are the seat totals for 2006?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2012, 01:08:44 PM »

I like the seating chart!

Also kind of interested that you shifted Harper from Calgary SW to SE. Any particular reason?

Harper, Brison, and Williams seem top-tier in terms of quality of candidates on paper, but I dislike Harper enough that my top tier will be Goodale, Brison, Williams. From what little I know of them Flaherty, Clement, and MacKay don't seem particularly inspiring.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2012, 09:38:31 PM »

MacKay really does strike me as somewhat uninspiring for whatever reason, but with Brison's endorsement I don't see how he loses this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.