those who oppose their agenda have made some sort of decision that democracy is not always necessary, and that in some cases rape, torture, and massacre of civilians by their govt is preferable.
While they themselves believe them to be good and necessary as long as its their own government but not its own civilians.
This point of view is necessary to protect civilization's holiest value, moral relativism. Otherwise, we might come to a shocking and awful decision like that Hitler was evil or at least wrong in the absolute, ignoring the obvious logical truth that the Holocaust was one of an infinity of subjective positives.
Both parts of that proposition are true.
...
Anyways, back to the subject (or rather, explaining my earlier post):
when you make such rash, superpartisan, and indeed quite insulting statements (not that I was really insulted, but that's only because it was clear that insulting people was not your intention) like the one I replied to, you simply deserve one back.