Why the hell is Missouri called "the bellwether state"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 08:40:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why the hell is Missouri called "the bellwether state"
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why the hell is Missouri called "the bellwether state"  (Read 4772 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 30, 2011, 11:07:01 AM »
« edited: January 30, 2011, 11:09:43 AM by Kirk & Madsen 101 »

I mean Ohio and Nevada (according to this) are more accurate.  And if you want to go even further back............


Kind of odd that they start in 1904 in order to try to get Missouri it's overrated "bellwether" status.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2011, 11:18:41 AM »

I mean Ohio and Nevada (according to this) are more accurate.  And if you want to go even further back............


Kind of odd that they start in 1904 in order to try to get Missouri it's overrated "bellwether" status.

Location and demographics are most often cited as the cause of Missouri's bellwether status. The Chicago Tribune calls Missouri the "bellwether state that almost exactly mirrors the demographic, economic and political makeup of the nation."[9] A microcosm of the country's current political makeup, Missouri has its two Blue "coasts" of St. Louis and Kansas City with Red middle and southern areas (see Red states and blue states).
Since 1980, the mean center of U.S. population of the United States (which has been moving steadily westward) has been in Missouri (currently in Phelps County). Missouri is in the center of the country, distant from the coast and the national borders. It shares a border with two Southern states, three Plains states, two Midwestern states, and one other Border state.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2011, 11:22:28 AM »

I mean Ohio and Nevada (according to this) are more accurate.  And if you want to go even further back............


Kind of odd that they start in 1904 in order to try to get Missouri it's overrated "bellwether" status.

Location and demographics are most often cited as the cause of Missouri's bellwether status. The Chicago Tribune calls Missouri the "bellwether state that almost exactly mirrors the demographic, economic and political makeup of the nation."[9] A microcosm of the country's current political makeup, Missouri has its two Blue "coasts" of St. Louis and Kansas City with Red middle and southern areas (see Red states and blue states).
Since 1980, the mean center of U.S. population of the United States (which has been moving steadily westward) has been in Missouri (currently in Phelps County). Missouri is in the center of the country, distant from the coast and the national borders. It shares a border with two Southern states, three Plains states, two Midwestern states, and one other Border state.

Okay that makes a lot more sense than "hurr durr it voted the most accurately for the winner!" logic I hear a lot.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2011, 12:44:34 PM »

Because it voted with every winner from 1904 to 2004, with sole exception of 1956?

Kentucky and Delaware were used to be called bellwether states as well.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2011, 03:32:32 PM »

At one point it was an accurate reflection of America. But these days it has too few Hispanics and Asians and maybe too many Blacks.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2011, 03:38:10 PM »

No.

As to that "blue and red coasts" thingy... it has no Democratic Upper Midwest. Add one and you'd get it far closer to national average in vote patterns. Wink

Yah, the real answer is "because journalistic usage of such terms tends to lag behind reality a fair bit".
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2011, 08:43:19 PM »

First, the cartoon is about how strange it was in 1904 for MO to have voted GOP. It had been a reliably Dem state. And then for a long time, it was a swing state. Pretty obviously leans GOP today with rural areas falling hard in love with the Republican party.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2011, 09:38:52 PM »

Also note the location. MO, KY, and DE are all "border states" on the Civil War map. Back in the old days, the Political alignment was essentially the Civil War map and thus it makes sense that the swing states would be in the border states.


Also, Memphis is right about MO in 1904.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2011, 11:43:42 PM »

a little bit off topic, but was the legislature run by democrats in the 90s? If so, they should have realized that something like this was going to happen to Ike Skelton sooner or later. What they should have done was make a district that starts in Columbia, heads west and takes in the counties between Columbia and KC (including his hometown Lexington) and then taking in the eastern part of Jackson County.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2011, 11:52:26 PM »

a little bit off topic, but was the legislature run by democrats in the 90s? If so, they should have realized that something like this was going to happen to Ike Skelton sooner or later. What they should have done was make a district that starts in Columbia, heads west and takes in the counties between Columbia and KC (including his hometown Lexington) and then taking in the eastern part of Jackson County.

You expect people to see 10 years into the future, when in GA in 1991 they could see 1 and 3 years ahead, despite blatantly obvious GOP gains in atleast 2 if not three of the districts that they drew immediately in 1992.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,179
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2011, 05:07:36 PM »

Similarly to "landslide", the word "bellwether" is constantly misused.

People usually like to talk about bellwhethers as States which often vote like the nation overall. I think this conception is pretty erroneous, and I could detail my reasoning in a long post. But instead, I will simply consider two fictional States.

Here are the two State of Weirdland (WL) and Moderateland (ML). Let's see how the nation vote in 5 presidential elections :
El 1 : R+1
El 2 : R+3

El 3 : D+3
El 4 : R+1
El 5 : D+1

Here is the WL vote :
El 1 : R+15
El 2 : R+10

El 3 : D+15
El 4 : R+20
El 5 : D+10

And here ML vote :
El 1 : D+3
El 2 : D+1

El 3 : R+3
El 4 : D+2
El 5 : R+1

WL voted each time for te national winner, ML voted each time for the loser. Which is the best bellwhether of the two ?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2011, 06:10:42 PM »

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=129982.0

MO has the 4th highest correlation behind PA, IN and NM for correlation of %D statewide to %D nationwide.

I'm working on the GOP numbers, but from 1960 to 2008, it can be somewhat justified in calling it a bellweather of sorts.
Logged
Dunce
AndrewJackson111
Rookie
**
Posts: 53
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2011, 08:53:02 PM »

Tennessee was a bellwhether from 1960-2004. McCain ended the chain.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 12 queries.