TX-PPP: Obama tied with Palin/Perry, all other Republicans ahead (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:50:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  TX-PPP: Obama tied with Palin/Perry, all other Republicans ahead (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX-PPP: Obama tied with Palin/Perry, all other Republicans ahead  (Read 8520 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


« on: January 22, 2011, 03:40:33 PM »

i think that the democrats should at least attempt in winning Texas. First, it is an electoral goldmine. Second, the state has a democratic history. I believe that since the formation of the two party system in 1856, the state has voted Democratic 24 times, Republican 12 times, and Third Party once (1860).
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2011, 04:40:20 PM »

Obama can campaign here as many times as he want, it still isn't going to swing the state his way.
[/quote]

What does Obama have that Jimmy Carter, Lyndon  Johnson, Jack Kennedy, Harry Truman, FDR, John Davis, James Cox, Woodrow Wilson, William Jennings Bryant, Alton Parker, Grover Cleveland, Winfield Hancock, Samuel Tilden, Horace Greeley and James Buchanan didn't?
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2011, 10:14:19 PM »

Indeed, Texas has swung dramatically from its Democratic days. If we are to assume that Obama would be competitive there today due to the state's history of voting for Democrats, then by the same logic Vermont must also be competitive for the Republicans.
[/quote]

The reason why Vermont doesn't vote republican anymore is because the national party has written them off. If the party made it an effort to reason with them, Vermont could vote republican.

Remember that old man Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Eisenhower, Dewey, Wilkie, Landon, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding, Hughes, Taft, T. Roosevelt, McKinley, Harrison, Blaine, Garfield, Hayes, Grant, Lincoln and Fremont all won Vermont.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2011, 07:15:32 PM »



4. He would have to perform well in the suburbs of Dallas and Houston. Obama did badly in those suburbs, much in contrast to suburbs of cities like Detroit and Philadelphia.  Sure, he would have to campaign in places like Arlington, Denton, and Mesquite -- but he would show that he cares about Texas.

All those places he mentioned Obama did OK in. Denton and Mesquite actually went for Obama something like 51-49 and Arlington is pretty swing territory with the exception of the wealthy areas like Pantego or Dalworthington Gardens. The strong republican suburbs you're talking about would be places like Coppell or Spring Branch.


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.