Marist Poll: Obama approval increasing, destroys all Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:19:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Marist Poll: Obama approval increasing, destroys all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Marist Poll: Obama approval increasing, destroys all Republicans  (Read 3343 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 14, 2011, 12:58:44 AM »



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/01/13/106788/poll-obama-rebounding-with-voters.html

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/misc/usapolls/US110106/McClatchy/McClatchy_Marist%20Poll_National%20Survey_January%202011.pdf
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,818
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2011, 01:43:34 AM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2011, 04:48:08 AM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Neither Huckabee nor Romney has been offering any economic solutions.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2011, 06:22:24 AM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Neither Huckabee nor Romney has been offering any economic solutions.

As if the average voter would know the difference in January 2011.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2011, 01:12:51 PM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Neither Huckabee nor Romney has been offering any economic solutions.

As if the average voter would know the difference in January 2011.

I honestly believe there is some dim understanding among more and more voters that in the new era of impoverishment, right-wing voting is dangerous to ones life and health.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2011, 03:28:34 PM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

What is to say that the economy will be in so sluggish a state in 2012? It is less sluggish than it was two years ago, when many people thought that we had an ongoing replay of the 1929-1933 meltdown.

I am not surprised at how the President matches up to Sarah Palin. People are beginning to recognize her for what she is. At this point I could see her doing as badly as Landon '36, Goldwater '64, McGovern '72, or Mondale '84 if she were the Republican nominee. Her rhetoric has become an object of ridicule. Hint: the money goes elsewhere. She can't raise enough money to offset the power of the 527 organizations.
   
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2011, 04:00:57 PM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Indeed.  Luckily, it will have recovered by then.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2011, 05:17:50 PM »

I have a feeling that the 2012 election is going to be pretty anti-climatic.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2011, 10:20:35 PM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Indeed.  Luckily, it will have recovered by then.

And the GOP will claim it was due to their forcing the upper income tax cut extension.

Most optomistic numbers of this poll:

"Will Obama do a better job or worse job the next two years?

Better: 61%

Worse: 21%"

Even if this is an overly friendly voter sample as px75 suggests, those are some very bullish indicators about optomism for Obama.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2011, 10:56:43 PM »

As much as I wish this poll were right, it does seem fishy.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2011, 11:08:27 PM »

Although I doubt these numbers are accurate, it does slightly fit into the current trend right now. 
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2011, 11:17:54 PM »

On the other hand, Gallup had Obama at 49/43, and the RealClearPolitics average is 49/46, so that part of the poll is not out of line.

 
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2011, 01:17:04 AM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Indeed.  Luckily, it will have recovered by then.

And the GOP will claim it was due to their forcing the upper income tax cut extension.

...putting them in the awkward position of having to praise Barack Obama for their supposed chief argument that they got the country out of the recession.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2011, 06:42:20 AM »

Way too optimistic. Obama's numbers are undoubtedly on the upswing but I have a hard time believing that he beats Huckabee and Romney by double digits while the economy is still in such a sluggish state.

Indeed.  Luckily, it will have recovered by then.

And the GOP will claim it was due to their forcing the upper income tax cut extension.

It won't matter what anybody claims; the fact is a tolerable economy = positive for incumbent regardless of specific policies or attributions of those.  However I suppose it is far from certain that the economy will be 'recovered' by that time.. or rather, whether it will be perceived to have recovered.
Logged
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2011, 08:12:33 AM »

That's not consistent with Palin's 15 point lead in Texas.

Trash poll.
Logged
albaleman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,212
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2011, 10:34:00 AM »

I don't believe this poll, though I can believe things are getting better for Obama. Odd they didn't poll Obama vs. Gingrich.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 16, 2011, 11:00:31 AM »

Maybe Americans are just in love with divided government? 
Logged
jbgator
Rookie
**
Posts: 108
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 16, 2011, 11:30:05 AM »

Palin and Romney aren't the best candidates.  A new face needs to get some air time and get hype like Obama had.  Give Gingrich a microphone and watch him in the debates.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2011, 01:25:43 PM »

Palin and Romney aren't the best candidates.  A new face needs to get some air time and get hype like Obama had.  Give Gingrich a microphone and watch him in the debates.

Such would be the equivalent of bringing a knife to a gun fight.  Gingrich has done little debating. He'd be rusty. President Obama would beat Newt Gingrich at the former Congressman's supposed strength.

The GOP nominee is likely to be someone who has done "long and distinguished service to the Party" because it is going to have other concerns -- like perhaps taking over the Senate (still possible if Obama wins) and protecting the House majority (which shows no signs of offering anything other than a rehash of a stale agenda defeated in 2006). 
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2011, 12:09:06 AM »

Palin and Romney aren't the best candidates.  A new face needs to get some air time and get hype like Obama had.  Give Gingrich a microphone and watch him in the debates.

Gingrich = "a new face"? Huh
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 14 queries.