1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:12:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District 		« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
Author Topic: 1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District  (Read 35775 times)
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 03, 2011, 04:25:25 AM »
Quote from: px75 on January 03, 2011, 04:06:31 AM
How come Clinton lost Oklahoma 5th worse than the 6th. I thought the panhandle would make the latter more heavily Republican.

And New Mexico's districts seem unchanged from the current ones.

Oklahoma's 6th contains Oklahoma City's  black and working class populations.  Wink
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 03, 2011, 07:29:34 AM »
Quote from: Niki the Shiwawa on December 30, 2010, 09:32:56 AM
Poor people who don't give muchos dineros to Dave can't see the map, fyi. That includes me.

I'll see if I can get something for you.  Wink
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 03, 2011, 12:36:12 PM »
Any preferences?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,807
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: January 03, 2011, 01:24:21 PM »
you're a diamond here in the blog Wink
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: January 03, 2011, 01:32:54 PM »

Thanks, I appreciate it!  Smiley
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,106
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: January 03, 2011, 01:36:56 PM »
Can you do Virginia and North Carolina?
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: January 03, 2011, 05:26:10 PM »
Quote from: px75 on January 03, 2011, 01:36:56 PM
Can you do Virginia and North Carolina?

Yes, it will take me some time though, both states are gerrymandered pretty well. 
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,360
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: January 07, 2011, 01:13:00 PM »
That's very interesting. Looking at TX and OK, or at IN and PA, seems like electoral geography has changed a lot in 16 years...
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: January 09, 2011, 05:28:18 PM »
Quote from: Senator Antonio V on January 07, 2011, 01:13:00 PM
That's very interesting. Looking at TX and OK, or at IN and PA, seems like electoral geography has changed a lot in 16 years...

Yes, strange how Clinton did so well in those rural areas.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: January 09, 2011, 05:31:18 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Fuzzleton on January 03, 2011, 05:26:10 PM
Quote from: px75 on January 03, 2011, 01:36:56 PM
Can you do Virginia and North Carolina?

Yes, it will take me some time though, both states are gerrymandered pretty well. 

I apoligize, my 1996 Almanac only has the 1992 results by 1993 districts.  And my paid account expired some days ago.

Sorry Sad
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: January 09, 2011, 05:32:46 PM »
But I do have another interesting battleground state to hold some interest for the time being:

Michigan
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: January 09, 2011, 06:08:29 PM »
Illinois
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: January 09, 2011, 06:16:56 PM »
Wisconsin
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: January 09, 2011, 07:57:52 PM »
Of course it would take a long time, but I would love to see California.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: January 09, 2011, 08:34:36 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Fuzzleton on January 03, 2011, 02:02:16 AM
Quote from: px75 on January 03, 2011, 01:57:01 AM
How many districts Clinton carried in Texas?

18 for Clinton, 12 for Bush (but Bush won his districts with much bigger average margins of course, which gave him the edge).

Even though the VRA requires some districts to favor Democrats--appears to be nine on that map, the six at the border, two in Houston, and one in Dallas, aside from that, Clinton won 9 white-majority (or plurality) to 12 for Bush. Very impressive.

Illinois is surprising, I expected that northern Ill. was more GOP back then and southern Ill. more Dem back then, but I was surprised at the extent.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,838
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: January 09, 2011, 08:42:18 PM »
so the districts where Bush got 50 percent are: Combest's district, Burton's district, PA 17, and OK 5?
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: January 09, 2011, 11:10:18 PM »
Quote from: freepcrusher on January 09, 2011, 08:42:18 PM
so the districts where Bush got 50 percent are: Combest's district, Burton's district, PA 17, and OK 5?

So far I have LA-1, OH-1, TN-1, T-7, PA-17, IN-6, OK-5, MS-1, MS-3, MS-4, MS-5, TX-19, TX-21, TX-8, TX-7, and TX-22 listed as districts which went 50% or more for Bush.  There might be one more in Louisiana.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: January 09, 2011, 11:20:21 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2011, 03:54:14 AM by Mr. Fuzzleton »
Quote from: Χahar on January 09, 2011, 07:57:52 PM
Of course it would take a long time, but I would love to see California.

Of course.  However, I only made a map showing the winners and not the margins.  Dave already has one for paid members, and it would be kind of rude to his business to put up another % map on this site.  Sorry.  


But anyways, it's better than nothing.


California


Edit:  Apologies, a couple districts in Southern California were wrong. I think they're fixed.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: January 09, 2011, 11:26:10 PM »
Nevada
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: January 09, 2011, 11:36:46 PM »
Alabama
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: January 09, 2011, 11:40:23 PM »
Just a random FYI for all those interested in Michigan, Gore actually won the state's 11th CD while Clinton lost it narrowly.  Although the Dem margins in '92 and 2000 were only about 2% apart, it's still an interesting switch. 
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,896
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: January 09, 2011, 11:51:49 PM »
A little on the unsurprising side given the general differences between Clinton's vote in 1992 and Gore's eight years later. I'm more interested to find out that the tenth voted for Bush.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: January 10, 2011, 02:52:57 AM »
« Edited: January 10, 2011, 03:14:00 AM by Mr. Fuzzleton »
Oregon
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: January 10, 2011, 03:11:44 AM »
New Jersey
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: January 10, 2011, 03:59:28 AM »
Quote from: Mr. Fuzzleton on January 09, 2011, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: Χahar on January 09, 2011, 07:57:52 PM
Of course it would take a long time, but I would love to see California.

Of course.  However, I only made a map showing the winners and not the margins.  Dave already has one for paid members, and it would be kind of rude to his business to put up another % map on this site.  Sorry. 

Oh, that's perfectly fine. It's very nice.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.