Apportionment fun (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:21:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Apportionment fun (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Apportionment fun  (Read 12332 times)
Signet
Newbie
*
Posts: 9
« on: November 22, 2004, 04:46:41 AM »
« edited: November 22, 2004, 04:48:35 AM by Signet »

What if the Apportionment was based on voters, not population?

imo that would be a bad idea.  If your state is probably going to go for the other party (ie if you are a democrat in TX or a republican in NY), it's in your best interest not to vote - therefore denying the candidate you don't want to win added electoral votes and, if you're in a state that is likely to have lots of the other party's members as representatives, denying them seats in the House.
Logged
Signet
Newbie
*
Posts: 9
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2004, 10:53:37 PM »
« Edited: November 23, 2004, 10:58:11 PM by Signet »

Bogart, I've heard that projected out eventually the Electoral colllage system will fail because of population shifts and a real minority with the power of electing the president over a vast majority.

Regardless of what happens to our water supplies and state populations, it'd be hard to imagine a realistic scenerio where that happens.

A way the Electoral College could fail is if a small handful of states that often vote together ever got more than 50% of the electoral votes.  Something like CA being worth 150 and NY worth 120.  In that case, winning CA and NY would mean winning the election, regardless of how the rest of the country voted.  But since NY lost EV's the last time around, i don't see that as being very likely.

Of course, those states would have to have a sizeable majority of the nation's population in order to have that many EV's in the first place, since they get only 4 of the 100 "senate" votes.

Or a more ridiculous extreme, if CA became worth 270 electoral votes, whoever won that state would win the election  :lol:  Again, that's not likely at all... and if it ever did happen, they'd probably want to divide the state into a few smaller states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.