|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2020, 09:35:00 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  The real loser of the election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The real loser of the election  (Read 5737 times)
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 04, 2010, 05:38:47 am »



Pussied out of polling competitive primaries and was spectacularly off in a lot of his general election polling.

At least he's got his book career to fall back on.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,275
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2010, 07:04:24 pm »

I know about Hawaii.....but where was his polling so far off? I really can't think of much.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2010, 07:24:38 pm »

He was off on the "national House ballot" by more than anyone except Gallup.  He had a systematic bias towards the GOP of a couple of points in most of the individual races.  Of course, if you subtract off that "house effect", the polling isn't bad (except in Hawaii).
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,958
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2010, 09:01:34 pm »

Scott Rasmussen did say about a week or two before the election that he expects a net GOP gain of 55, which they accomplished. His generic ballot was ridiculous, though.

Otherwise, especially for Nevada, his polls were definitely off. But he did well in Florida, I must admit.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,770
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2010, 04:14:49 am »

Rasmussen had an average error of nearly six points (more than all the other large polling firms) and a clear systematic Republican bias of nearly four points. Except for Gallup and its ridiculous generic ballot numbers, Rasmussen was probably the worst pollster of the cycle (not counting random uni polls): http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/rasmussen-polls-were-biased-and-inaccurate-quinnipiac-surveyusa-performed-strongly/

Logged
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,239
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2010, 05:54:46 am »

Add that the FOX/Pulse polls were actually marginally better than the officially Rasmussen polls.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,575
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2010, 11:36:10 am »

And the winner is... PPP!!!!
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,119
Liechtenstein


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2010, 12:57:26 pm »

Rasmussen was not out of range of the other pollsters in Nevada, so that's a pretty poor example.  They were the best pollster in Kentucky and especially Florida, where they nailed both races.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2010, 04:22:17 pm »

Even more interesting in the long term, according to Nate's chart an Internet poll that does not even do random sampling but just asks pre-selected people the survey questions and then weights by relevant party ID and demographic factors did about as well as the non Internet polls.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,770
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2010, 09:56:11 am »

lol scott...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/03/scott_rasmussen_polls_inaccurate
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2010, 12:21:01 pm »

I love how liberals make it a career out of waging nuclear war against Rasmussen. Come on, people, he's not Zogby.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,119
Liechtenstein


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2010, 12:34:11 pm »


The comments on that are hilarious.
Logged
Trends are real, and I f**king hate it
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 51,939
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2010, 01:10:38 pm »

And you know what's the worse ? Rasmussen's polls made up 37% of 538.com's database, thus they caused their projections to be far off in some States... and this led me to miss many of my Atlas predictions ! This clown will make me have a poor score... Sad
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.193 seconds with 14 queries.