Historical election least likely to be called "close" *or* a "landslide" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:39:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Historical election least likely to be called "close" *or* a "landslide" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Historical election least likely to be called "close" *or* a "landslide"  (Read 5991 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


« on: February 07, 2013, 10:15:05 AM »

True, but Reagan got less than 51% of the vote in 1980, which certainly would not have been a landslide in a two person election, and he only got 254 of his EV by winning a majority of the vote in the States in question.  (Reagan would still have won versus a combined Carter+Anderson, but not versus a combined everyone else.)  Judging by the swing/trend for 1980, a solid majority of the 1980 Anderson voters were 1984 Mondale voters.  With the exception of Utah, all of the States that actually swung Democratic in 1984 were ones that Anderson did better than average in.  (Were Mormons voting against Carter in 1980 because he was a Southern Baptist?)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.