How would elections turn out if America was only white

[Ameriplan]

1952: Eisenhower
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Kennedy
1964: Johnson
1968: Humphrey
1972: Humphrey
1976: Carter
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Dukakis
1992: Buchanan
1996: Buchanan
2000: Clinton
2004: Clinton
2008: McCain

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

1952: Eisenhower
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Nixon
1964: Johnson
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Ford
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Dole
2000: Bush
2004: Bush
2008: McCain

[Ameriplan]

1952: Eisenhower
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Nixon
1964: Johnson
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Ford
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Dole
2000: Bush
2004: Bush
2008: McCain

Why would a Republican serve one term and be suceeded by another Republican?

[Ameriplan]

1952: Eisenhower
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Nixon
1964: Johnson
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Ford
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Dole
2000: Bush
2004: Bush
2008: McCain

Why would a Republican serve one term and be suceeded by another Republican?

Plus you have Nixon three times.

[justW353]

Straight R, bar 1964.

[Sasquatch]

I shudder to think!

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Well, Vermont, Hawaii, and DC would be alright. Most other states, not so much.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

1952: Eisenhower
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Nixon
1964: Johnson
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Ford
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Dole
2000: Bush
2004: Bush
2008: McCain

Why would a Republican serve one term and be suceeded by another Republican?

Plus you have Nixon three times.

Substitute _______(R) if you'd like.

[Bo]

1868:D
1872:R
1876:D
1880:R
1884-1892:D
1896-1908:R
1912-1916:D
1920-1928:R
1932-1944:D
1948-1960:R
1964:D
1968-2008:R

[Ameriplan]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

America might have become only-white after the end of slavery if Lincoln had lived to see through his plan of mass-deportations of blacks.

[Bo]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

Um, why would Mediterranean and Eastern European whites immigrate to a country that would enslave them?

[Bo]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

Um, why would Mediterranean and Eastern European whites immigrate to a country that would enslave them?

They wouldn't do it voluntarily. The Anglo-Saxons would bind them and force them to come over here. I think back in the Middle Ages Europeans actually enslaved one another, before they discovered the African slave trade.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

Um, why would Mediterranean and Eastern European whites immigrate to a country that would enslave them?

They wouldn't do it voluntarily. The Anglo-Saxons would bind them and force them to come over here. I think back in the Middle Ages Europeans actually enslaved one another, before they discovered the African slave trade.

No, they didn't. They had serfdom in medieval Europe, not slavery. And they would have been far better prepared to fend off attempts at forcing their enslavement than the Africans were.

[Ameriplan]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

Um, why would Mediterranean and Eastern European whites immigrate to a country that would enslave them?

They wouldn't do it voluntarily. The Anglo-Saxons would bind them and force them to come over here. I think back in the Middle Ages Europeans actually enslaved one another, before they discovered the African slave trade.

No, they didn't. They had serfdom in medieval Europe, not slavery. And they would have been far better prepared to fend off attempts at forcing their enslavement than the Africans were.

Nah, it's not like Africans were invaded by whites, black people in Africa sold their war prisoners to visiting white people. Whites were just new customers in the long-lived African slave trade.

[Bo]

I think a better phrasing of this question would have been "How would election results in the U.S. have turned out if only whites could vote in all U.S. states?"

[Mechaman]

LMAO at this entire thread.

[DS0816]

LMAO at this entire thread.

Me too.

It's the same thing as whites accusing blacks of having voted overwhelmingly for Obama simply because he's black … while disregarding they voted overwhelmingly for Kerry … for Gore … for Clinton … for .................................................................

[Derek]

Now wait a minute, if there were only whites, then slavery would never have existed! and thus the Republican party wouldn't have either...

If the South would have still had plantations in a whites-only America, I could see the Anglo-Saxon whites enslaving the Mediterranean and Eastern European whites.

Um, why would Mediterranean and Eastern European whites immigrate to a country that would enslave them?

They wouldn't do it voluntarily. The Anglo-Saxons would bind them and force them to come over here. I think back in the Middle Ages Europeans actually enslaved one another, before they discovered the African slave trade.

No, they didn't. They had serfdom in medieval Europe, not slavery. And they would have been far better prepared to fend off attempts at forcing their enslavement than the Africans were.

Nah, it's not like Africans were invaded by whites, black people in Africa sold their war prisoners to visiting white people. Whites were just new customers in the long-lived African slave trade.

That's very true and you know what? Democrats do not want you to know that. Just like they don't want you to know about the black founding fathers that they have erased from our history books because they want it to sound like America has always been full of black oppression.

[Derek]

Not a democrat would be in office at the federal level.

[nclib]

Not a democrat would be in office at the federal level.

LOL. Dozens of congressional districts have more white Democrats than white Republicans.

Also, if we imagine America was all-white, that would change campaigns and perceptions of both parties. Take 1988, where Dukakis did better among whites living in predominantly white areas, than whites in areas with lots of blacks. (Compare the 1988 results of WA, OR, MN, WI vs. MD, DE, NJ, IL)

[Derek]

Not a democrat would be in office at the federal level.

LOL. Dozens of congressional districts have more white Democrats than white Republicans.

Also, if we imagine America was all-white, that would change campaigns and perceptions of both parties. Take 1988, where Dukakis did better among whites living in predominantly white areas, than whites in areas with lots of blacks. (Compare the 1988 results of WA, OR, MN, WI vs. MD, DE, NJ, IL)

Yes whites in those states would vote democrat. However, would Obama be in office if it were just whites? No.

[Bo]

Not a democrat would be in office at the federal level.

LOL. Dozens of congressional districts have more white Democrats than white Republicans.

Also, if we imagine America was all-white, that would change campaigns and perceptions of both parties. Take 1988, where Dukakis did better among whites living in predominantly white areas, than whites in areas with lots of blacks. (Compare the 1988 results of WA, OR, MN, WI vs. MD, DE, NJ, IL)

Yes whites in those states would vote democrat. However, would Obama be in office if it were just whites? No.

Of course he wouldn't be in office. If the U.S. was only white, he wouldn't be here since he is half black.

[Derek]

Not a democrat would be in office at the federal level.

LOL. Dozens of congressional districts have more white Democrats than white Republicans.

Also, if we imagine America was all-white, that would change campaigns and perceptions of both parties. Take 1988, where Dukakis did better among whites living in predominantly white areas, than whites in areas with lots of blacks. (Compare the 1988 results of WA, OR, MN, WI vs. MD, DE, NJ, IL)

Yes whites in those states would vote democrat. However, would Obama be in office if it were just whites? No.

Of course he wouldn't be in office. If the U.S. was only white, he wouldn't be here since he is half black.

Oh haha yea I guess that's a good point.