Hillary Clinton/Evan Bayh vs. Mitt Romney/John Thune with no financial crisis (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 12:51:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Hillary Clinton/Evan Bayh vs. Mitt Romney/John Thune with no financial crisis (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Clinton/Evan Bayh vs. Mitt Romney/John Thune with no financial crisis  (Read 1941 times)
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« on: June 21, 2010, 02:32:21 AM »

Mitt would do the same thing to Clinton that Obama did then.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2010, 08:12:03 PM »

Hillary wouldn't win in the south today.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2010, 09:24:45 PM »

Hillary wouldn't win in the south today.

She would win some states.

I don't understand where everybody gets that idea.

Hillary's not even a native Southerner. She's originally from Illinois, and she became well-known as a carpetbagger Senator from New York. Her only connection to the South is Bill Clinton.

That's good enough for many voters. Both Bushes weren't native Southerners either.

Bush 41 wasn't considered a Southerner. Hence why he did so poorly in the South against Southerner Clinton.

Bush 43 did everything he could to promote a Southern image, the opposite of what Hillary did in carpetbagging her way to New York.

Many voters will still think Bill will ahve a huge influence in a Hilalry Clinton Presidency, and thus vote for Hillary since Bill is a native Southerner.

Al Gore was a real native Southerner and lost every Southern state.

His views weren't southern in the 2000 election.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2010, 04:29:03 PM »

Hillary wouldn't win in the south today.

She would win some states.

I don't understand where everybody gets that idea.

Hillary's not even a native Southerner. She's originally from Illinois, and she became well-known as a carpetbagger Senator from New York. Her only connection to the South is Bill Clinton.

That's good enough for many voters. Both Bushes weren't native Southerners either.

Bush 41 wasn't considered a Southerner. Hence why he did so poorly in the South against Southerner Clinton.

Bush 43 did everything he could to promote a Southern image, the opposite of what Hillary did in carpetbagging her way to New York.

Many voters will still think Bill will ahve a huge influence in a Hilalry Clinton Presidency, and thus vote for Hillary since Bill is a native Southerner.

Al Gore was a real native Southerner and lost every Southern state.

His views weren't southern in the 2000 election.

And Hillary Clinton's would have been in 2008?

No she would have lost the south too. Here is my map.

http://


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.