NC: Rasmussen: Burr leads by eight
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 28, 2023, 09:30:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  NC: Rasmussen: Burr leads by eight
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC: Rasmussen: Burr leads by eight  (Read 1494 times)
Mr.Barkari Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 84,091
Jamaica
P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 06, 2010, 12:30:32 PM »

New Poll: North Carolina Senator by Rasmussen on 2010-5-5

Summary: D: 40%, R: 48%, I: 3%, U: 9%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2010, 12:33:32 PM »

Last Rassy poll Burr was up by 22, this just goes to show you that Burr can lose this race once people start to know Marshall.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,526


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2010, 12:34:48 PM »

This race will definitely be competitive, especially if unemployment begins to fall.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2010, 12:36:23 PM »

This race will definitely be competitive, especially if unemployment begins to fall.

If unemployment starts to fall then this race will be slight Democratic take over. Burr is weaker then Dole was in 2008.
Logged
Mr.Barkari Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 84,091
Jamaica
P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2010, 01:39:48 PM »

Based on Bev Perdue's poll numbers, she doesn't appeal to the same voters and she did in 2008 therefore, Marshall will have a tough time being elected. This race leans GOP and so does NV and IND, unless the dems net gain seats, and there's a low probabilty that will happen.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2010, 01:45:02 PM »

Seat is cursed.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2010, 01:53:48 PM »

Here's hoping whichever Democratic candidate will be able to surmount Burr's tiny lead. The man's useless.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2010, 01:59:28 PM »

Last Rassy poll Burr was up by 22, this just goes to show you that Burr can lose this race once people start to know Marshall.

This goes to show you that Rasmussen state polling isn't very good.
Logged
Mjh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 255


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2010, 02:03:03 PM »

The polling for Burr have been all over the place. The 20% lead last time probably exagerated his lead, but I still think he'll pull through. This is the kind of seats that the Democrats would easily in in 2006 or 2008, but not this year.

I think the only GOP held seat the Democrats have a shot at is Voinovics seat in Ohio.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2010, 02:23:53 PM »

Last Rassy poll Burr was up by 22, this just goes to show you that Burr can lose this race once people start to know Marshall.

This goes to show you that Rasmussen state polling isn't very good.

PPP polls for this race show it just as close as well. I will not be shock to find the poll that PPP will have out next week to have this race with-in five percent.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2010, 02:28:28 PM »

This race will definitely be competitive, especially if unemployment begins to fall.

I read the new Gallup report from the past couple days and employment has gone up by 5 points on it.  Obviously this is not in percentages.

Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2010, 02:32:05 PM »

Last Rassy poll Burr was up by 22, this just goes to show you that Burr can lose this race once people start to know Marshall.

This goes to show you that Rasmussen state polling isn't very good.

PPP polls for this race show it just as close as well. I will not be shock to find the poll that PPP will have out next week to have this race with-in five percent.

What I meant was, that it was never a 20 point race.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2010, 02:50:03 PM »

Last Rassy poll Burr was up by 22, this just goes to show you that Burr can lose this race once people start to know Marshall.

This goes to show you that Rasmussen state polling isn't very good.

PPP polls for this race show it just as close as well. I will not be shock to find the poll that PPP will have out next week to have this race with-in five percent.

What I meant was, that it was never a 20 point race.

Oh, I see. Yea I agree, it wasn't.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 39,643
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2010, 03:28:56 PM »

This race will definitely be competitive, especially if unemployment begins to fall.

I read the new Gallup report from the past couple days and employment has gone up by 5 points on it.  Obviously this is not in percentages.



BTW, Happy: Thanks for posting that graph which clearly shows the current crappy state of the economy is entirely Obama's fault.

Remember folks, nothing ever happened prior to Jan, 2009.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,164
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2010, 03:59:17 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?
Logged
Mjh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 255


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 07, 2010, 12:57:27 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?

I think it goes both ways. I agree that the Democrats look more competitive in North Carolina, but on the other hand Kirk looks far stronger in Illinois than he did just a month or two ago.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 07, 2010, 02:16:03 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?

I think it goes both ways. I agree that the Democrats look more competitive in North Carolina, but on the other hand Kirk looks far stronger in Illinois than he did just a month or two ago.

Mainly because Giannoulias is turning out to be a stock typical corrupt Illinois Democrat.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2010, 02:31:26 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?

I think it goes both ways. I agree that the Democrats look more competitive in North Carolina, but on the other hand Kirk looks far stronger in Illinois than he did just a month or two ago.

Mainly because Giannoulias is turning out to be a stock typical corrupt Illinois Democrat.

I agree, if he Democrats had a good candidate for this race, they would be way ahead in the polls.
Logged
Mjh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 255


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 07, 2010, 03:16:28 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?

I think it goes both ways. I agree that the Democrats look more competitive in North Carolina, but on the other hand Kirk looks far stronger in Illinois than he did just a month or two ago.

Mainly because Giannoulias is turning out to be a stock typical corrupt Illinois Democrat.

And because Kirk is an excellent candidate. If the Illinois GOP had nominated someone like Alan Keyes, then Giannoulias would easily win, despite his obvious flaws.
Logged
Mr.Barkari Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 84,091
Jamaica
P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 07, 2010, 03:22:07 PM »

The Dems were very fortunate to have ran against two rightwing conservatives in Fitzgerald and Keyes and Baar Topinka in the last few election cycles. Now they are faced with credible challengers and the GOP might start winning now.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2010, 03:31:45 PM »

Very nice. Is it me or are a lot of these polls starting to look a little less dire for Dems?

I think it goes both ways. I agree that the Democrats look more competitive in North Carolina, but on the other hand Kirk looks far stronger in Illinois than he did just a month or two ago.

Mainly because Giannoulias is turning out to be a stock typical corrupt Illinois Democrat.politician

Fixed for accuracy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 15 queries.