UK Election - Results Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 29, 2024, 04:31:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK Election - Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 ... 51
Author Topic: UK Election - Results Thread  (Read 82920 times)
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #775 on: May 06, 2010, 10:28:16 PM »

Ester Rantzen got 4.5%...
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #776 on: May 06, 2010, 10:28:24 PM »

Does anyone know the curious custom of having the returning officer physically announce the results accompanied by the candidates, wearing those party colours?
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #777 on: May 06, 2010, 10:28:47 PM »

The thing to remember is that the key number is Labour+LDs. The SNP will not support any form of PR, SF will not take their seats, and the Unionists will not want an LD government. Furthermore, this election makes the prospect of an independent Scotland a strong likelihood - if there is a Tory government. So the likely Tory goal is 311, not 326.

But do the Labour and LD voters in Scotland really want independence?  Sure they'd prefer a different government, but if the Tories aren't too dickish (big assumption I know), they'd be tolerated for a while.

or no?

No they don't, but view in Scotland is that a Tory government in Westminster=best chance for a yes vote in an independence referendum. It means the Tory's do need either group, but a Lab-Lib-SNP alliance is impossible.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #778 on: May 06, 2010, 10:29:11 PM »

Luton South-Lab Hold.  Lab to Con swing 4.6%.

York Outer to the Tories.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #779 on: May 06, 2010, 10:29:19 PM »

Tories take Oxford West.  Majority 176. 6.9% swing.

And the LD's drop another seat as well, Abington. It is a really suck night for the LD's, a veritable disaster vis a vis expectations.

That's the same constituency as Oxford West.  Its full name is Oxford West & Abington.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,398
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #780 on: May 06, 2010, 10:29:23 PM »

My God this is depressing.  I just give up, looks like we'll lose seats this time around.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #781 on: May 06, 2010, 10:30:10 PM »

What a deep, deep, deep disappointment for the LDs.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,905
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #782 on: May 06, 2010, 10:30:58 PM »

Can someone explain how something gets named Stoke-on-Trent C?  Is there a B and an A?

Stoke-on-Trent Central is the full constituency name. There is also a Stoke-on-trent South and a Stoke-on-Trent North
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,179
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #783 on: May 06, 2010, 10:31:02 PM »

Tories take Oxford West.  Majority 176. 6.9% swing.

And the LD's drop another seat as well, Abington. It is a really suck night for the LD's, a veritable disaster vis a vis expectations.

That's the same constituency as Oxford West.  Its full name is Oxford West & Abington.

IC. What I do know, is that place is one of the most beautiful places on this planet. It's almost magical.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,056


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #784 on: May 06, 2010, 10:32:08 PM »

On the other hand, it looks like the exit poll will prove to be fairly accurate.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,398
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #785 on: May 06, 2010, 10:34:49 PM »

On the other hand, it looks like the exit poll will prove to be fairly accurate.

If only it was accurate when it showed President Kerry.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #786 on: May 06, 2010, 10:35:29 PM »

Labour: 3.9 million votes, 121 seats
Liberal Democrats: 3.1 million votes, 23 seats

Awesome

England Results:
LD 24.8%, 15 Seats
Lab 24.1%, 59 Seats

An absolute tragedy for any democratic system.

Please, maybe the LibDems should work harder at building a base- other than yuppies.

How does that have any relevance? Why should one party get a built in advantage simply because of the type of supporters they have?

They cant seal the deal. If they were more popular they would be able to win these close seats they are continually losing.  My cheap insult aside- they have to look inward and broaden their appeal or get a core group of supporters.

That doesn't make any sense logically. Why should Labour and the Conservatives get more seats just because their supporters happen to live geographically closer together?

Should we gerrymander to benefit them them?   All of the parties deal with the current method of voting.  Districts are drawn and votes cast.  I see very few people complain when it is the opposition that barely loses.
Logged
The Man From G.O.P.
TJN2024
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #787 on: May 06, 2010, 10:35:43 PM »

Yikes, Lib Dems spike into negative territory...


Jack Smith up now... DIE
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #788 on: May 06, 2010, 10:36:27 PM »

Jaquie's gonna cry!
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #789 on: May 06, 2010, 10:36:31 PM »

Redditch
Con Gain from Labour.  Majority of 6,000
Logged
The Man From G.O.P.
TJN2024
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #790 on: May 06, 2010, 10:37:14 PM »

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Let's celebrate that one shall we???
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,179
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #791 on: May 06, 2010, 10:38:24 PM »
« Edited: May 06, 2010, 10:40:59 PM by Torie »

Tories trounch a Labor incumbent in Redich attended by financial issues with a huge swing.
Dewsbury drops to the Tories with a 5.9% swing. The Tories are getting what they need barely to form a majority government in England, but the UK has a bit more than just England.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,056


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #792 on: May 06, 2010, 10:38:59 PM »

Why is London taking so long?
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #793 on: May 06, 2010, 10:39:20 PM »

Tories gain Dewsbury on a swing of 5.9%.  Maj 1526.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #794 on: May 06, 2010, 10:39:44 PM »


Why is she so special that she gets to give a concession speech on the BBC?
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #795 on: May 06, 2010, 10:40:50 PM »

Labour: 3.9 million votes, 121 seats
Liberal Democrats: 3.1 million votes, 23 seats

Awesome

England Results:
LD 24.8%, 15 Seats
Lab 24.1%, 59 Seats

An absolute tragedy for any democratic system.

Please, maybe the LibDems should work harder at building a base- other than yuppies.

How does that have any relevance? Why should one party get a built in advantage simply because of the type of supporters they have?

They cant seal the deal. If they were more popular they would be able to win these close seats they are continually losing.  My cheap insult aside- they have to look inward and broaden their appeal or get a core group of supporters.

That doesn't make any sense logically. Why should Labour and the Conservatives get more seats just because their supporters happen to live geographically closer together?

Should we gerrymander to benefit them them?   All of the parties deal with the current method of voting.  Districts are drawn and votes cast.  I see very few people complain when it is the opposition that barely loses.

No, they should have a system that is actually representative of the partisan preference of the electorate. I don't understand how that's so complicated for you to understand.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #796 on: May 06, 2010, 10:41:05 PM »


Why is she so special that she gets to give a concession speech on the BBC?

Former Home Secretary. Her husband used her expenses to buy porn.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,056


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #797 on: May 06, 2010, 10:41:22 PM »

Tories would have to win over half of the remaining seats to get a majority.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #798 on: May 06, 2010, 10:41:52 PM »

Tories over 200 now.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #799 on: May 06, 2010, 10:41:55 PM »

Balls has held his seat.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 ... 51  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.