Worst Candidates in Modern History
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:22:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Worst Candidates in Modern History
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9
Author Topic: Worst Candidates in Modern History  (Read 31930 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #150 on: June 14, 2010, 05:43:05 PM »

I agree. Mondale also blew a 17 point lead I believe but I cut him a break because he ran against Reagan.



Mondale never blew a 17-point lead. Reagan was always leading him. As for Dukakis, it's true he blew an early double-digit lead, but keep in mind that the issues in 1988 favored Bush Sr. and once people began to pay attention to the race in the fall, Bush Sr. caught up to and overtook Dukakis.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #151 on: June 14, 2010, 05:46:57 PM »

Ya Mondale was never even in the thing, he trailed sometimes by as many as 20 points. Lol but really Dukakis never even fought back and then at the end riding around in that tank lol, what a joke. He looked like an idiot.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #152 on: June 14, 2010, 05:49:44 PM »

Ya Mondale was never even in the thing, he trailed sometimes by as many as 20 points. Lol but really Dukakis never even fought back and then at the end riding around in that tank lol, what a joke. He looked like an idiot.

For the tank incident, Margaret Thatcher tried it in Great Britain before and it helped out her poll numbers. Thus, Dukakis thought that it would do the same thing for him.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #153 on: June 14, 2010, 06:02:19 PM »

Maybe if he would have tried it early on, but by that time he was seen as such a bufoon.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #154 on: June 14, 2010, 06:03:02 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #155 on: June 14, 2010, 07:49:18 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #156 on: June 14, 2010, 07:51:53 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #157 on: June 14, 2010, 07:53:27 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.

Reagan was too poor of a campaigner to win all 50 states. Oh yeah! Democrats 1-Republicans 0.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #158 on: June 14, 2010, 07:56:40 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.

Reagan was too poor of a campaigner to win all 50 states. Oh yeah! Democrats 1-Republicans 0.

Stop! I didn't see Mondale winning 49 out of 50. He was a great president rather than a great campaigner.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #159 on: June 14, 2010, 07:57:21 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.

Reagan was too poor of a campaigner to win all 50 states. Oh yeah! Democrats 1-Republicans 0.

Stop! I didn't see Mondale winning 49 out of 50. He was a great president rather than a great campaigner.

In your opinion.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #160 on: June 14, 2010, 08:00:38 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.

Reagan was too poor of a campaigner to win all 50 states. Oh yeah! Democrats 1-Republicans 0.

Stop! I didn't see Mondale winning 49 out of 50. He was a great president rather than a great campaigner.

In your opinion.

Btw I don't see anyone putting Reagan on here as the worst candidate in modern history.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #161 on: June 14, 2010, 08:05:26 PM »

Ok I was confusing him with the Dukakis poll. Good job Walter, way to man!

Yeah, good job for winning MN and DC. Reagan, despite all his greatness, couldn't win there.

Well Reagan declined to campaign in his opponent's home state out of the kindness of his heart. D.C. wouldn't vote for the GOP if Bin Laden were the alternative.

Reagan was too poor of a campaigner to win all 50 states. Oh yeah! Democrats 1-Republicans 0.

Stop! I didn't see Mondale winning 49 out of 50. He was a great president rather than a great campaigner.

In your opinion.

Btw I don't see anyone putting Reagan on here as the worst candidate in modern history.

I meant the part about Reagan being a great President. He wasn't so great in my opinion.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #162 on: June 14, 2010, 08:31:37 PM »

History has been very kind to Reagen. His approval ratings were always in the mid 50's, the highest he ever got was 72 and that was after he got shot, and when he left office they were like 63, but throughout his first term they were constantly below 50 percent in fact in 1982 they hit like 38%.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #163 on: June 15, 2010, 01:11:25 AM »

History has been favorable but that means he did well. What short sighted moron judges a president's performance based on his approval ratings WHILE HE IS IN OFFICE? Come on you can't judge an administration until history can really weigh in.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #164 on: June 15, 2010, 01:25:06 AM »

Thats not what I mean there has been this myth put out that Reagan was so very popular through out his administration and thats just not true, not by a long shot. His numbers were just ok.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #165 on: June 15, 2010, 01:39:01 AM »

Thats not what I mean there has been this myth put out that Reagan was so very popular through out his administration and thats just not true, not by a long shot. His numbers were just ok.

Tell me we agree on something.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #166 on: June 15, 2010, 01:46:01 AM »
« Edited: June 15, 2010, 01:47:47 AM by cpeeks »

Well there have been a few things we have agreed on, dont worry  I will get you straightened out on what to think, lol.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #167 on: June 15, 2010, 01:47:52 AM »

lol that's true
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #168 on: June 15, 2010, 12:44:28 PM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #169 on: June 15, 2010, 02:52:51 PM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #170 on: June 15, 2010, 04:03:57 PM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.

The Republicans were on the wrong side of history when it came to Social Security and Medicare.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #171 on: June 15, 2010, 09:57:04 PM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.

The Republicans were on the wrong side of history when it came to Social Security and Medicare.

Not once it goes bankrupt. The democrats will be looked at as greedy socialists who grew the government IN THE NAME OF helping the needy.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #172 on: June 16, 2010, 11:00:24 AM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.

LOL WHATEVER
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #173 on: June 16, 2010, 11:01:50 AM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.

Bush grew this goverment leaps and bounds but you say nothing about, and you are all for the war because you dont have to fight it.
The Republicans were on the wrong side of history when it came to Social Security and Medicare.

Not once it goes bankrupt. The democrats will be looked at as greedy socialists who grew the government IN THE NAME OF helping the needy.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #174 on: June 16, 2010, 12:29:26 PM »

Who says you can't judge a President during their time in office? Sure you can.

You can but not by approval rating. History takes time to unfold. That's why I still firmly support the Iraq war in fact each day since the invasion in 2003 I've supported it more and more. 50 years from now the democrats will be the party who was on the wrong side of history.

Bush grew this goverment leaps and bounds but you say nothing about, and you are all for the war because you dont have to fight it.
The Republicans were on the wrong side of history when it came to Social Security and Medicare.

Not once it goes bankrupt. The democrats will be looked at as greedy socialists who grew the government IN THE NAME OF helping the needy.

Did you mean to post something?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 11 queries.