Nevada, 1880
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:52:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Nevada, 1880
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nevada, 1880  (Read 930 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 29, 2010, 04:44:40 PM »

Why did Hancock defeat Garfield here in 1880? Nevada was typically a Republican state during the Gilded Age. Did Hancock win due to the Morey letter, or were there some other reasons?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2010, 03:43:37 AM »

Hancock did well in Oregon and California, too.
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2010, 09:42:51 AM »

Maybe the veteran vote? A lot of veterans moved out west, and perhaps they saw Hancock as a war hero.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2010, 12:31:49 PM »

Maybe the veteran vote? A lot of veterans moved out west, and perhaps they saw Hancock as a war hero.

Good point. Tilden and Cleveland weren't war veterans and thus failed to win Nevada (despite the fact that the elections they were in were also very close), while Hancock was a veteran and thus managed to win Nevada.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2010, 03:56:53 AM »

IIRC "Chinese Exclusion" was a campaign issue. That might be it.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2010, 12:47:38 PM »

Chinese exclusion might have played a role since Hayes had vetoed a Chinese exclusion bill in 1878, but since Arthur didn't veto a similar bill in 1878, I'm fairly certain it wasn't a Republican plank to oppose it in 1880, as the only major difference in the two parties platforms was the tariff. Hancock was not only a veteran, he had served out west, both before and after the Civil War, though his actual service in California and Utah Territory in particular  had been before the War.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.