Presidential Results as a percentage of eligible voters, Obama ties Reagan '84
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:21:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Presidential Results as a percentage of eligible voters, Obama ties Reagan '84
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Presidential Results as a percentage of eligible voters, Obama ties Reagan '84  (Read 1145 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 01, 2010, 11:05:21 AM »

Has anyone ever tried to measure election results as a percentage of eligible voters ?

US data to produce such data is very confuse, because there are so many people who are not eligible, such as non-citizens, prisoners etc.

But IŽll try and calculate it going back to 1980, using the total population of each year, subtract the 17 years and younger folks and the non-citizens.

Subtracting prison population would be complicated because there is insufficent data from 1980-2008. But those prisoners missing are more or less substituted by the Americans voting abroad anyway.

A few statistics to measure non-citizens:

1980 Census: 3.1%
1990 Census: 4.7%
2000 Census: 6.6%
2008 (ACS): 7.1%

(I guess the real number of non-citizens will be closer to 8-9%, but let's wait for the 2010 Census)

http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0029/tab11.html
http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/c2kprof00-us.pdf
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=&_lang=en&_ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&ts=

Here is what you get:

2008: 18+ folks: 231 Mio. (-7.1% non-citizens) = 214.6 Mio. voters
2004: 18+ folks: 221 Mio. (-6.9% non-citizens) = 205.8 Mio. voters
2000: 18+ folks: 211 Mio. (-6.6% non-citizens) = 197.1 Mio. voters
1996: 18+ folks: 200 Mio. (-5.8% non-citizens) = 188.4 Mio. voters
1992: 18+ folks: 191 Mio. (-5.1% non-citizens) = 181.3 Mio. voters
1988: 18+ folks: 182 Mio. (-4.3% non-citizens) = 174.2 Mio. voters
1984: 18+ folks: 174 Mio. (-3.7% non-citizens) = 167.6 Mio. voters
1980: 18+ folks: 167 Mio. (-3.1% non-citizens) = 161.8 Mio. voters

Based on these numbers you have the following results for each winner:

2008: Obama => 32.4%
2004: Bush => 30.2%
2000: Gore => 25.9%
1996: Clinton => 25.2%
1992: Clinton => 24.8%
1988: Bush => 28.1%
1984: Reagan => 32.5%
1980: Reagan => 27.1%

If the non-citizen population turns out to be more than 8% on Census Day 2010, Obama could even pass Reagan`s result in his 1984 landslide when measured as a percentage of total eligible US voters ...
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2010, 12:37:53 PM »

I am not sure im really following this, what are you trying to say?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2010, 12:47:53 PM »

I am not sure im really following this, what are you trying to say?
The share of the voting age citizen population to vote for Obama was about the same as voted for Reagan.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2010, 01:41:02 PM »

cant u just look at the percentage of voter turnout and figure that out
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2010, 01:52:04 PM »

cant u just look at the percentage of voter turnout and figure that out
The problem here is that voter turnout in the US is an inexact science, as there is no universal or near-universal registration.

Most media sources use "voting age population" for an approximation, but of course that includes noncitizens - their share has risen since 1984; Reagan won a larger share of the Voting Age Population than Obama. (There is also the issue with the lack of voting rights for convicts and, in a declining number of states, for some classes of ex-convicts.)
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2010, 01:59:50 PM »

well theres also more people in 2008 than in 1984
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2010, 02:00:58 PM »

well theres also more people in 2008 than in 1984
Well, of course. That's figured in in either typical VAP turnout calculations or this one, though.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2010, 02:12:18 PM »

ya im just still having a hard time following it like i said it looks like you could just look at the voter turnout
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.214 seconds with 12 queries.