1896: McKinley vs. Grover Cleveland (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:55:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1896: McKinley vs. Grover Cleveland (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1896: McKinley vs. Grover Cleveland  (Read 1346 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« on: February 27, 2010, 05:13:00 PM »
« edited: February 27, 2010, 05:14:35 PM by Lt. Gov and Rep. Libertas »


262-185
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2010, 06:09:23 PM »


I said everything else would stay the same. There's no way Cleveland wins with 15% unemployment.

He does according to my map.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2010, 06:13:11 PM »


How come? Cleveland was so unpopular in 1896 in RL that his own party refused to renominate him or even nominate someone with like-minded views. McKinley would easily crush Cleveland.

Cleveland refused to run; he wasn't that unpopular.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2010, 06:26:17 PM »


How come? Cleveland was so unpopular in 1896 in RL that his own party refused to renominate him or even nominate someone with like-minded views. McKinley would easily crush Cleveland.

Cleveland refused to run; he wasn't that unpopular.

If he wasn't unpopular, the Dems would have nominated someone who supported the gold standard and not the silver standard. BTW, even though approval rating polls didn't exist back then, it isn't hard to tell that Cleveland would have become unpopular since unemployment was 3% in 1892 and 15% in 1896.

Uh, no. The Dems had had internal strife between the two wings for years. When Cleveland refused to run, the Silverites managed to seize control of the party for that year.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.