British Elections 1918-1945
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 07:56:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  British Elections 1918-1945
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Author Topic: British Elections 1918-1945  (Read 59347 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #175 on: March 10, 2014, 01:38:45 PM »

Electorate of 90,000 by 1935!
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #176 on: March 10, 2014, 01:40:38 PM »


I suppose it was overpopulated? What was the size of an electorate, at that moment?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #177 on: March 10, 2014, 01:57:40 PM »

Normal would have been about half that.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,847


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #178 on: March 10, 2014, 02:29:33 PM »

I have a map of the 1945 result by 1950 boundaries kicking about somewhere.
Logged
stepney
Rookie
**
Posts: 123
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #179 on: March 24, 2014, 04:51:54 AM »

Stretford. Almost certainly done wrong.


Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #180 on: March 24, 2014, 02:16:16 PM »

Looks right to me. Classic example of a constituency of leftover parts that didn't end up in the parli boroughs to the north. It started out with the three towns named at the bottom, and a couple of detached parts of non-contiguous rural districts.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #181 on: March 24, 2014, 02:33:51 PM »

Well, it made sense in 1917, when it was drew. Stretford UD, Irlam UD, the Barton Moss, Flixton and Davyhulme parish of Barton-upon-Irwell RD and Astley parish of Leigh RD.

The changes on local goverments complicated things.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #182 on: March 24, 2014, 02:51:03 PM »

The interesting thing is that the changes in local government areas were generally driven by population changes: this is the area of ribbon development, 'metroland' and the first big suburban council estates.
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #183 on: March 29, 2014, 08:30:50 AM »

I want to rename that so hard...
Logged
EPG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #184 on: June 29, 2014, 06:27:18 AM »

Bump

1923 was a Liberal false dawn, with scores of 2- and 3-digit majorities. A year later in this region, they held two seats, gained and lost two against Labour, lost one to the Communists (really unofficial Labour) and lost all the rest to the Conservatives. Mosley would soon join Labour and move seat from Harrow to Birmingham, Ladywood, barely losing to Neville Chamberlain. Labour made progress in east London and the Thames estuary, stronger than their gains in other urban areas in 1923.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #185 on: August 27, 2015, 11:38:28 AM »
« Edited: August 27, 2015, 12:54:55 PM by Sibboleth »

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,068
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #186 on: August 27, 2015, 11:55:11 AM »

Really a gorgeous map! Cheesy I'm going to save it on my computer to avoid losing it.

It appears that there used to be non-contiguous constituencies back in these days? That's weird.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #187 on: August 27, 2015, 12:02:25 PM »

Plenty of red in East Anglia; those were the days.
Logged
joevsimp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 482


Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #188 on: August 27, 2015, 03:10:30 PM »

Plenty of red in East Anglia; those were the days.

not to mention the good old Common Wealth Party in Chelmesford, I've got Earnest Millington's autobiography on my Christmas list

</geek>
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,540
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #189 on: August 27, 2015, 03:41:23 PM »

It appears that there used to be non-contiguous constituencies back in these days? That's weird.

In various counties in Scotland and Wales you had constituencies called "Districts of Boroughs" (or "Burghs" in Scotland) which contained the major towns but not the rural bits between them.  Caernarfon Boroughs (which probably wasn't spelt that way back then) would be a particularly well known example because it was represented by Lloyd George for many years; in this election it's those disjointed bits of pale blue on the north-west Wales coast between the yellow of Anglesey and the deepish red of the rest of Caernarfonshire.  Most of the others had gone by this time.

Other examples will be because constituencies didn't generally contain parts of more than one county and some counties were themselves non-contiguous.  Flintshire is probably the best known example, but it looks like the bizarre boundaries of Worcestershire with Gloucestershire and Warwickshire were still reflected in the constituency map at this point.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,540
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #190 on: August 27, 2015, 03:44:27 PM »

BTW is there a reason for the three northern Highlands seats all being National Liberal?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #191 on: August 27, 2015, 05:26:42 PM »

BTW is there a reason for the three northern Highlands seats all being National Liberal?

Actually Caithness & Sutherland wasn't; just an extremely close (six votes) Tory win.* And oddly there's confusion over the labelling of the winner in Ross & Cromarty: he was not actually a member of either Liberal party. I've coloured the seat National Liberal because that's where he ended up.

*Con 33.5, Labour 33.4, Liberal 33.1. The defeated Liberal incumbent was the party's leader, Archibald Sinclair.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #192 on: August 27, 2015, 05:28:47 PM »

Caernarfon Boroughs (which probably wasn't spelt that way back then) would be a particularly well known example because it was represented by Lloyd George for many years; in this election it's those disjointed bits of pale blue on the north-west Wales coast between the yellow of Anglesey and the deepish red of the rest of Caernarfonshire.  Most of the others had gone by this time.

And that one was only preserved because the incumbent at the time of the 1917 boundary review happened to be the Prime Minister...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #193 on: September 02, 2015, 06:56:00 PM »

One of the constituencies divided for the 1945 election, though in this case into not one, not two, not three, but four seats:



By the time of the 1935 election this monster of a seat had an electorate of 168,000...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #194 on: September 07, 2015, 06:10:35 PM »

Maps showing the number of times a given party won each constituency in the period with notes. Enjoy.
Logged
DistingFlyer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 651
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 0.25, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #195 on: September 07, 2015, 08:16:37 PM »



I'd say they're all three - useful, interesting and pretty.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.