Bayh (I) v. Obama (D) v. Palin (R)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:00:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Bayh (I) v. Obama (D) v. Palin (R)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Bayh (I) v. Obama (D) v. Palin (R)  (Read 3831 times)
Poundingtherock
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 27, 2010, 06:16:14 PM »

Discuss with maps.

I see:

Palin (R)  41%
Obama (D) 39%
Bayh (I) 19%
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2010, 06:23:16 PM »

Palin, unfortunately, would probably win.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2010, 06:24:26 PM »

This would be the most depressing election result ever.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2010, 06:43:42 PM »

This would be the most depressing election result ever.

Obama (2009-2013)
Palin (2013-2017)
Clinton (2017-2025)

IMO, that's what would happen should that (forbid it) occur.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2010, 08:05:36 PM »

Unfortunatly Palin would win.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2010, 08:10:50 PM »


Obama: 43%
Palin: 40%
Bayh: 17%
Logged
sentinel
sirnick
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2010, 10:34:08 PM »

Palin, unfortunately, would probably win.


Not if the Superfriends can help it!
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2010, 10:38:29 PM »

While its unfortunate that Palin would win, the alternatives here are even worse.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2010, 10:42:35 PM »

While its unfortunate that Palin would win, the alternatives here are even worse.

Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2010, 10:46:24 PM »

This would be the most depressing election result ever.

Obama (2009-2013)
Palin (2013-2017)
Clinton (2017-2025)

IMO, that's what would happen should that (forbid it) occur.

Why would Palin lose reelection were she to win in 2012? I think if she wins (in 2012), the only way she loses reelection is if the U.S. goes into recession during her second term (which is actually possible).
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2010, 09:17:29 AM »

This would be the most depressing election result ever.

Obama (2009-2013)
Palin (2013-2017)
Clinton (2017-2025)

IMO, that's what would happen should that (forbid it) occur.

Hillary is a yesterday news.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2010, 09:23:11 AM »


Obama and Bayh have nothing to offer. At least Palin is right-wing.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2010, 10:44:08 PM »

Wow, who called Bayh out on this?  How prescient.  He's definitely running in 2016.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2010, 11:17:09 PM »

This would be the most depressing election result ever.

Obama (2009-2013)
Palin (2013-2017)
Clinton (2017-2025)

IMO, that's what would happen should that (forbid it) occur.

Why would Palin lose reelection were she to win in 2012? I think if she wins (in 2012), the only way she loses reelection is if the U.S. goes into recession during her second term (which is actually possible).

With her intellectual capabilities it is more probable the US economy would go into another depression.
Logged
ARescan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 271
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2010, 11:32:06 PM »

Worst election, ever.
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2010, 11:47:13 PM »

Wow, who called Bayh out on this?  How prescient.  He's definitely running in 2016.

he's made himself a quiter like Palin and he didn't even have a lawsuit filed against him every day. If he wanted a future he should have named himself the reformer of Washington and not be afraid to say no to the Democrats, instead he quit and plays the pointing finger games
Logged
Electric Feel
ElectricFeel
Rookie
**
Posts: 212
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -0.06, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2010, 11:50:39 PM »

Awful choices, but I could never vote for Bayh or Palin.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,035
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2010, 01:31:55 AM »

Why does everyone think Palin would win? She currently trails Obama by about 20 points. There is no way Bayh would get anywhere near that, not even double digits is likely. And a good chunk of his vote would come from anti-Obama people who could never vote for Palin anyway. I have a tough time seeing him eat into the Democratic base, reminds me of that "Joe Lieberman as McCain's running mate would bring over TONS of Democrats because so many Democrats love him!" garbage.

It'd look something like 1980 in reverse with Bayh being John Anderson.
Logged
Jensen
geraldford76
Rookie
**
Posts: 209
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -8.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2010, 01:35:04 AM »

Wow, even worse choices than 2008.

Who could have guessed? Tongue
I wish someone sensible would grow the balls to run.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2010, 11:43:16 AM »

Why is everyone assuming that Bayh would garner nearly 20% of the vote? He would max out at about 7% (9% tops). He is uncharasmatic and doesn't have any sort of coherent ideology. Bayh's only perogative in the past was to remain inoffensive and continue getting elected, the same thing wouldn't work in a presidential election.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,035
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2010, 12:01:47 PM »

Why is everyone assuming that Bayh would garner nearly 20% of the vote? He would max out at about 7% (9% tops). He is uncharasmatic and doesn't have any sort of coherent ideology. Bayh's only perogative in the past was to remain inoffensive and continue getting elected, the same thing wouldn't work in a presidential election.

Beet said it best was that Bayh was useful as a Democrat who could elected statewide in Indiana. He's useless otherwise. But yes, where does his strength come from? He's boring, uncharismatic, and can't exactly bring some sort of massive ideological rebellion.

Bayh might not even top John Anderson 1980.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2010, 12:09:54 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2010, 05:07:58 PM by theendisnigh »

Why is everyone assuming that Bayh would garner nearly 20% of the vote? He would max out at about 7% (9% tops). He is uncharasmatic and doesn't have any sort of coherent ideology. Bayh's only perogative in the past was to remain inoffensive and continue getting elected, the same thing wouldn't work in a presidential election.

Beet said it best was that Bayh was useful as a Democrat who could elected statewide in Indiana. He's useless otherwise. But yes, where does his strength come from? He's boring, uncharismatic, and can't exactly bring some sort of massive ideological rebellion.

Bayh might not even top John Anderson 1980.

I then pose the question: What use is a Democrat who votes like a confused 15 year old marks answers on a online political test in pursuit of a particular outcome? Another thread, another time.

John Anderson is actually a good comparison, as another elected official running from the center of his own party, and the two would garner a similar share of the popular vote. That being said, that's where the comparison ends as Anderson was actually a dignified individual with some integrity running opposed to Reagan's lunacy. Bayh is just an empty suit and a last name.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,541
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 18, 2010, 01:22:28 PM »

Obama would still win; like others have said, Bayh wouldn't be a factor in the race.
Logged
pragmatic liberal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 520


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2010, 08:54:03 PM »

Not. Gonna. Happen.

Bayh would not run as an independent and if he did he'd get crushed.

But in the extremely unlikely event that he did run, he would likely mostly just take the votes of conservatives who couldn't bring themselves to vote for Palin. Just like, as someone else said upthread, John Anderson mostly took votes from people who couldn't stomach voting for Carter again.

The results would be something like Obama 55%, Palin 35%, Bayh 10%.
Logged
Conservative frontier
JC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2010, 03:17:43 PM »

BEST election EVER.


Palin beats Obama, thanks to Bayh Cheesy



 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 10 queries.