Livingston Parish, Louisiana
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 02:06:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Livingston Parish, Louisiana
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Livingston Parish, Louisiana  (Read 1463 times)
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 09, 2009, 08:12:01 PM »
« edited: December 09, 2009, 08:13:48 PM by Rob »

Livingston is the fastest-growing parish in Louisiana. Places like Denham Springs have suddenly filled with subdivisions, as swarms of people seeking a different way of life have pushed east from Baton Rouge into the Sportsman's Paradise; since Hurricane Katrina, they've come from metro New Orleans, too.

The population has grown from 27,000 in 1960 to an estimated 112,000 in 2007. 94 percent of the population is white; 4 percent is black.

I'm interested in what happens when white-flight exurbia collides with traditional rural conservatism. In many ways, Livingston has a unique political history. Herbert Hoover nearly carried this rural WASP enclave in 1928, although he got only 24 percent statewide; it backed Truman over Thurmond in 1948; Stevenson over Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956; and Kennedy over "unpledged" electors in 1960, before giving 61 percent to Goldwater in 1964 and 81 percent for George Wallace in 1968- his best Louisiana showing.

Whatever else you can say of the place, its political preferences were rather... independent-minded. As recently as 1980, Carter won here as Reagan crushed him in the state as a whole. That was before the population changed beyond recognition, though.

Some interesting recent returns...

1990 Senate: Duke 64%, Johnston 34%
1991 Governor: Duke 60%, Edwards 40%
1999 Governor: Foster 80%, Jefferson 9%, Others 11%
2003 Governor: Jindal 57%, Blanco 43%

2008 Democratic Primary (4,937 votes): Clinton 66%, Obama 22%, Edwards 7%
2008 Republican Primary (4,110 votes): Huckabee 56%, McCain 30%, Paul 6%, Romney 5%

1996 US President (34,095 votes): Dole 47%, Clinton 39%, Perot 12%
2000 US President (36,865 votes): Bush 68%, Gore 30%
2004 US President (44,253 votes): Bush 77%, Kerry 22%
2008 US President (50,892 votes): McCain 85%, Obama 13%*

*Compare with 2008 Senate: Kennedy 67%, Landrieu 31%
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 08:23:50 PM »

Populists.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 08:25:28 PM »

1990 Senate: Duke 64%, Johnston 34%
1991 Governor: Duke 60%, Edwards 40%
Now that's good country folk. FFs all the way.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 08:26:08 PM »

1990 Senate: Duke 64%, Johnston 34%
1991 Governor: Duke 60%, Edwards 40%
Now that's good country folk. FFs all the way.

You're not actually funny.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2009, 08:28:07 PM »

1990 Senate: Duke 64%, Johnston 34%
1991 Governor: Duke 60%, Edwards 40%
Now that's good country folk. FFs all the way.

You're not actually funny.

What is funny about saving the country from tyranny?
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2009, 11:52:38 PM »

What's interesting to note about the election for governor in 1991, is that Edwin Edwards was a corrupt douchebag.  Just as corrupt, if not moreso, than David Duke.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2009, 05:06:21 PM »

1990 Senate: Duke 64%, Johnston 34%
1991 Governor: Duke 60%, Edwards 40%
Now that's good country folk. FFs all the way.

You're not actually funny.
It's one of the handful of Duke places to actually vote for Jindal in 2003. Just ordinary uber-Republican exurbia. At least by 2003.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.