Saturday, August 21, 2010 - Australian Federal Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:50:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Saturday, August 21, 2010 - Australian Federal Election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
Author Topic: Saturday, August 21, 2010 - Australian Federal Election  (Read 31152 times)
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,976
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: August 20, 2010, 06:51:36 PM »

What time does coverage start, British time?

The polls close at 6.00pm (I can only assume in each time zones). The Eastern Australian timezone that covers Canberra is 9 hours ahead of the UK, so I am expecting the polls to close at 0800 or 0900 BST.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: August 20, 2010, 07:10:47 PM »

I think ABC might be opening theirs up later so ex-pats can watch. Not sure when and - anyway - I might be wrong.

ABC's website says Saturday evening they will stream globally in the evening, but I haven't seen anything live yet on their site.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: August 20, 2010, 07:13:43 PM »
« Edited: August 20, 2010, 07:24:56 PM by change08 »

I think ABC might be opening theirs up later so ex-pats can watch. Not sure when and - anyway - I might be wrong.

ABC's website says Saturday evening they will stream globally in the evening, but I haven't seen anything live yet on their site.

Probably their election results programme, which I think starts at 6pm Australian time, 9am UK, and 4am EST.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: August 20, 2010, 07:18:13 PM »

I better wake up way before 9AM EST (as I usually do) if I want to catch some good ol' election night suspensy-stuff.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: August 20, 2010, 07:57:30 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

hahahaha. what an awfully carried out poll.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,547
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: August 20, 2010, 08:27:08 PM »

It became a close race. When Labor had a lopsided lead, no one paid attention to Tony Abbott because his winning was an impossibility. As a consequence, people focused on how unhappy they were with Labor, with how Rudd was ousted, with aspects the campaign, etc. When Abbott actually becoming Prime Minister became a real prospect, Labor had a message and went over to the offensive, and it looks like a number of voters recoiled at the prospect. Now whether that is enough of them is an open question, and I am interested mainly because I suspect Obama's reelection campaign in 2012 may largely mirror Gillard's.

That sounds like the Swedish election. The opposition leading quite a bit because people mostly focus on being unhappy with the incubent goverment, but as the election draws closer people starts to realise that don't actually want the awful leader of the opposition as PM, and even though they're not completely happy  with the goverment the other alternative is even worse, and thus making the race a tie.





Its the general pattern of a lot of elections. Built-up resentment tends to bubble up early in campaigns, with the opposition being a convenient outlet. Its at that critical point when the opposition begins to pull ahead that everyone begins to look at them as a potential government rather than an opposition. And a lot of them fail that test. See Stephen Harper in 2004, Mockas in Columbia, and I would argue, even Kerry in the US. Of course if they pass that test you get something resembling the 1980 Presidential race.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: August 20, 2010, 08:34:54 PM »

It became a close race. When Labor had a lopsided lead, no one paid attention to Tony Abbott because his winning was an impossibility. As a consequence, people focused on how unhappy they were with Labor, with how Rudd was ousted, with aspects the campaign, etc. When Abbott actually becoming Prime Minister became a real prospect, Labor had a message and went over to the offensive, and it looks like a number of voters recoiled at the prospect. Now whether that is enough of them is an open question, and I am interested mainly because I suspect Obama's reelection campaign in 2012 may largely mirror Gillard's.

That sounds like the Swedish election. The opposition leading quite a bit because people mostly focus on being unhappy with the incubent goverment, but as the election draws closer people starts to realise that don't actually want the awful leader of the opposition as PM, and even though they're not completely happy  with the goverment the other alternative is even worse, and thus making the race a tie.





Its the general pattern of a lot of elections. Built-up resentment tends to bubble up early in campaigns, with the opposition being a convenient outlet. Its at that critical point when the opposition begins to pull ahead that everyone begins to look at them as a potential government rather than an opposition. And a lot of them fail that test. See Stephen Harper in 2004, Mockas in Columbia, and I would argue, even Kerry in the US. Of course if they pass that test you get something resembling the 1980 Presidential race.

Happened in the UK too I guess, only not so strongly and we ended up with a hung parliament with the opposition as the only viable government. 6-12 months earlier, everyone expected them to walk it and end up with majority of 50-80.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,547
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: August 20, 2010, 08:54:14 PM »

It became a close race. When Labor had a lopsided lead, no one paid attention to Tony Abbott because his winning was an impossibility. As a consequence, people focused on how unhappy they were with Labor, with how Rudd was ousted, with aspects the campaign, etc. When Abbott actually becoming Prime Minister became a real prospect, Labor had a message and went over to the offensive, and it looks like a number of voters recoiled at the prospect. Now whether that is enough of them is an open question, and I am interested mainly because I suspect Obama's reelection campaign in 2012 may largely mirror Gillard's.

That sounds like the Swedish election. The opposition leading quite a bit because people mostly focus on being unhappy with the incubent goverment, but as the election draws closer people starts to realise that don't actually want the awful leader of the opposition as PM, and even though they're not completely happy  with the goverment the other alternative is even worse, and thus making the race a tie.





Its the general pattern of a lot of elections. Built-up resentment tends to bubble up early in campaigns, with the opposition being a convenient outlet. Its at that critical point when the opposition begins to pull ahead that everyone begins to look at them as a potential government rather than an opposition. And a lot of them fail that test. See Stephen Harper in 2004, Mockas in Columbia, and I would argue, even Kerry in the US. Of course if they pass that test you get something resembling the 1980 Presidential race.

Happened in the UK too I guess, only not so strongly and we ended up with a hung parliament with the opposition as the only viable government. 6-12 months earlier, everyone expected them to walk it and end up with majority of 50-80.

At the time they were polling Labour's unpopularity, rather than Cameron's support. That Cameron was an inoffensive empty suit. It also meant however, that when the focus shifted to him the drop was greater. He clawed it back because of the chaos of the Liberal surge.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: August 20, 2010, 09:03:16 PM »

The ABC stream is now working (at least for me). Very good quality too.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/abcnews24/
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: August 20, 2010, 09:14:45 PM »

Labor's InTrade numbers have gone from the 60's into the 50's in the past day or so.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,722
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: August 20, 2010, 09:15:56 PM »

In Britain the worst ratings for the government party usually come mid term rather than at the start of the campaign; the 2005-2010 now stands as a classic in that regard. You actually tend to get a boost for the governing party in the runup to the election.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: August 20, 2010, 09:32:25 PM »

We should know most of the results, especially those in NSW and QLD pretty early tonight because of no daylight savings time.

Either way, the Australian people will lose. This campaign has been atrocious. Both sides have clung onto appalling rhetoric of 'real action' and 'moving forward' to no avail. Even if the Mad Monk were to become our 28th Prime Minister tonight, our ignorant electorate still won't be shocked.

In spite of my cynicism, I am hoping for a hung Parliament (it seems likely based on recent numbers out of NSW, QLD and WA). Finally, politics in this country will become interesting again!
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: August 20, 2010, 11:02:49 PM »

ABC has just said that Morgan has conducted an exit poll of some sort, which suggests a 51/49 split to Labor and a hung parliament.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: August 20, 2010, 11:18:54 PM »
« Edited: August 20, 2010, 11:24:01 PM by ilikeverin »

The ABC stream is now working (at least for me). Very good quality too.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/abcnews24/

Gorgeous.  And authentic Australian accents! Smiley

EDIT: Hehehe, President Obammer.

EDIT 2: Did the ABC news guy just pronounce "mantra" with the first syllable identical to that in "man"?  lolololol.  wtf Australian English, stop being more American than American English.  Okay, I'll stop now.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: August 21, 2010, 12:51:05 AM »

ABC has just said that Morgan has conducted an exit poll of some sort, which suggests a 51/49 split to Labor and a hung parliament.

That would certainly be an interesting result. Of course a minority government for either party would be better than entering a coalition with the Greens.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.