|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 14, 2020, 03:14:52 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  2009 Foreign Policy Review Bill [On President's Desk] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2009 Foreign Policy Review Bill [On President's Desk]  (Read 10608 times)
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« on: December 01, 2009, 10:14:14 pm »

Of course the SOEA supports this bill.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2009, 10:31:25 pm »


One spelling error! OMG!
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2009, 10:15:58 pm »

I very much approve of the distinguished Senator's changes.  Of course there are new developments in the world since I wrote the original review.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2009, 10:36:00 pm »

Would this be the place to discuss foreign aid, or would that be a separate bill?

This is primarily accepting the FPR as legislation passed by past Senates requires. Humanitarian aid is usually other legislation, and I would be happy to sponsor any bill dealing with humanitarian aid to Africa.

I'm also obviously open to any amendments on my amendment, concerning Uganda if they arise.

They deserve aid, but I think the current policy in this bill is good.

Only problem with aid on my part is that it just helps out the government leaders and little actually gets to the average people.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2009, 01:41:53 pm »

Would this be the place to discuss foreign aid, or would that be a separate bill?

This is primarily accepting the FPR as legislation passed by past Senates requires. Humanitarian aid is usually other legislation, and I would be happy to sponsor any bill dealing with humanitarian aid to Africa.

I'm also obviously open to any amendments on my amendment, concerning Uganda if they arise.

They deserve aid, but I think the current policy in this bill is good.

Only problem with aid on my part is that it just helps out the government leaders and little actually gets to the average people.

Well, yeah, but we can support organizations aiding people there such as "Invisible Children" and such. You could also add a caveat that they lose aid if they don't produce results.

Thats all I'm suggesting largely.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2009, 06:05:38 pm »

I had raised issues with Uganda on the SOEA's page. Too early to make a call (as we need to see what law they pass if any) Should they make the regressive move then the LGBT Trade Act would kick in.

Well we don't have any FTAs with them anyway lol.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2009, 11:55:45 pm »

I had raised issues with Uganda on the SOEA's page. Too early to make a call (as we need to see what law they pass if any) Should they make the regressive move then the LGBT Trade Act would kick in.

Well we don't have any FTAs with them anyway lol.

The situation isn't funny.

I never said the situation was .  That was'nt at all what I meant.....
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 12:11:55 am »

I had raised issues with Uganda on the SOEA's page. Too early to make a call (as we need to see what law they pass if any) Should they make the regressive move then the LGBT Trade Act would kick in.

Well we don't have any FTAs with them anyway lol.

The situation isn't funny.

I never said the situation was .  That was'nt at all what I meant.....

I bolded the problem.

I am aware.  I thats just a speech tick I use in any conversation I have online.  Don't take it like that.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2009, 12:59:15 pm »

I will line item veto this, to alleviate the concerns of our allies in Taiwan, by including the following line:

Taiwan: Normal

I send this back to the Senate so edited.

I was just about to suggest such an action.  Good work Mr. President.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.379 seconds with 14 queries.