Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)

Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,200

Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

Re: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

« on: November 16, 2009, 07:59:25 PM »

Well that didn't work.
Then again I'm banned from doing something I can't do for months anyway Tongue

Hopefully the law will get changed.

Logged

Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,200

Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

Re: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2009, 11:03:13 PM »

Quote from: GM Purple State on November 16, 2009, 10:54:52 PM

Quote from: Senator MaxQue on November 16, 2009, 10:06:03 PM

Quote from: Teddy on November 16, 2009, 07:59:25 PM

Well that didn't work.
Then again I'm banned from doing something I can't do for months anyway Tongue

Hopefully the law will get changed.

No, we banned de-registration for a reason.

Before my time. What reason?

Someone de-registered then got voted into something.

Rather than ban voting for a de-registered person, they banned de-registration.

Logged

Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,200

Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

Re: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2009, 12:05:38 AM »

You'll have to tell that to them. (points to elected officials)

They seem to have a tendency to react to a current problem with an everlasting law that's written so concisely as to cause future problems.

Logged

Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,200

Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

Re: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 05:04:28 PM »

The law needs to be fixed not repealed.

Logged

Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,200

Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

Re: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2009, 11:02:33 PM »

Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 10:42:06 PM

Quote from: Swing Voter on November 21, 2009, 07:48:23 PM

Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 12:11:52 PM

Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on November 21, 2009, 11:51:07 AM

Quote from: PASOK Leader Hashemite on November 21, 2009, 11:31:12 AM

Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on November 21, 2009, 11:21:20 AM

Note to the AG : Shouldn't Hamilton/Swing Voter be prosecuted for voter fraud ?

Swing Voter never registered.

Sh**t... I wish he did just before Nik posted the PMs.

Yes and come to think of it, he can't register for several months till Hamilton falls off the Voter Roll. Thats what got Josh/Devilman. He didn't wait long enough.

I think the PMs made it clear I would never register two accounts at once. You guys are talking like I made this account to cheat the game, and I didn't. I made this account to get away from the game.

THEN GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seconded

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 29, 2024, 09:07:16 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more