Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

[tmthforu94]

After reading through, I must say, I think we would be setting a dangerous precedent if Tweed won ths.

[tmthforu94]

Bumping this in light of Suburban New Jersey Conservative v Tack50, MB, LouisvilleThunder, Adam Griffin.

[tmthforu94]

I am very pleased by the ruling of The Court in Tmthforu94 vs. Fremont. Having the wording struck down was always a longshot due to past precedent (though I disagree with it) regarding Preambles. Despite statements by the First Minister to the contrary, comments have been made by Fremont politicians that suggest they believe the western Region has a legal claim to take Kansas. With this ruling, The Court ruled against that notion and that only a federal constitutional amendment can change the status of a state - this was the most important part to me in setting a precedent and boundary to keep regions from taking further action on this.

Hopefully this issue can be put to rest and focus can be had on more pressing issues in the game.