Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 24, 2021, 04:58:59 PM

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 53431 times)
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,961
Australia


« on: January 02, 2020, 10:54:28 PM »

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=351962.msg7112046#msg7112046

The Supreme Court was surprisingly quick in dismissing Suburban's misunderstanding of what due process means.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,961
Australia


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2020, 01:26:50 AM »

It doesn't seem like off-hand comments by one legislator in Lincoln (not representing the entire legislature and Governor of Lincoln) should be considered appropriate evidence by the Court. Plus, I thought fhtagn hated Discord leaks? In any case, the Supreme Court is not the appropriate venue for people to score political points against one another.

There is the argument that the courts should not only consider the letter of the law but also the spirit of the law. And to understand the spirit of the law you must understand what the drafter of the law intended.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,961
Australia


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2020, 08:21:52 AM »

So, bumping this in light of FairBol's case, which I have to say is probably one of the most frivolous cases to come to the court. ASV, Wulfric, Peebs, and Encke, a total of four independent sources, all of vastly different partisan affiliations, all came to the same conclusion, I think FairBol's count is wrong and he made a mistake somewhere.

That doesn't matter. It's an elections case, and it must be heard. If Fairbol has an argument, he should be free to raise it before the court.

And the court likewise has every right to dismiss the case, especially if Fairbol fails to provide any evidence.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,961
Australia


« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2021, 07:56:38 AM »

Wulfric managing to  up a vote of no confidence so badly it might render it null and void is thoroughly unsurprising from such a beacon of hopeless incompetence. Genuinely impressive that he might have managed to do this.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,961
Australia


« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2021, 02:26:48 AM »

I get the feeling LT is just going to ignore this
It's a bold strategy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.