Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 11:58:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 70702 times)
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22
« on: March 20, 2022, 04:26:29 PM »
Quote from: Sen. WB #NoToJo on March 20, 2022, 02:26:19 PM
The region is not expressing an ideological stance, it is coercing localities to express an ideological stance.

The existence of God is a matter of fact, not a stance, opinion, or belief.
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2023, 06:15:53 AM »
« Edited: April 29, 2023, 11:34:25 AM by Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee »
No need to get personal. Please.
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2023, 11:38:25 AM »

Mr. Chief Justice,

Is there a procedure for resolving no feedback from jurors after X amount of time and also is there a certain threshold of time for no response which could lead to a juror being replaced or some other effort being made to resolve the situation?

Thanks,
WM
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.