Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

[OBD]

In retrospect, an explicitly nonbinding resolution may have been a more appropriate path to tackle this issue. However, I agree with Truman that the Kansas provision in the Fremont constitution is nonbinding and has no legal effects, and thus shouldn't be struck down by this Court - that's a job for Parliament to do, if appropriate (and it very well might be given the universal unpopularity of this action).

[OBD]

[OBD]

You're the ones who changed voting laws to favor your party right before an election.

Hey, a very good friend of mine who I've known for seven years got invalidated as well! How dare you intrude upon my grief!

[OBD]

Can someone gimmie a CliffNotes of the debate in Nunja0428 vs. Lincoln? Getting borderline unreadable lmao

[OBD]

Is there any evidence that the information was posted against the person's will, as the law says?

Trust me I wouldn't be bringing the case up if LT had received consent from the "victim" to post their personal information

Has the victim said that it was against their will? Wouldn't they have to identify themselves to do so, since the victim isn't actually known besides their IRL name?

Ideally not, as then we'd be committing a massive breach of privacy against someone who has already had the misfortune of getting their name revealed against their will. Surely that's not what you're suggesting?

[OBD]

$10 says Yankee uses his mod powers to yeet the Southerners by the end of the crisis