Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:06:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 70748 times)
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515
« on: November 15, 2009, 05:24:21 PM »
I've suggested expanding the court to five. But my other idea was to have one to three federaldistrict court type judges who handle trials only. Leave the adminstrative and appellate functions to us.  It's a little weird for me to handle the appeal of a case I've tried. My two cents.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2009, 04:03:56 AM »
Quote from: GM Purple State on November 22, 2009, 12:44:55 AM
Something interesting I noticed while checking the Court's Wiki page that got me wondering: What is the story behind Chief Justice bullmoose88's leap-frog to the position of CJ from junior AJ. Did senior AJ opebo turn down the position of CJ?


There is no requirement that the replacement for the cj be the senior associate or a member of the court at all. It's at the discretion of the president with the advice and consent of the senate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.