Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)

[ilikeverin]

You’re claiming that Pericles vote is invalid because he posted, and then deleted a ballot- something which you also allegedly did.

If this court rules Pericles vote invalid, then your vote would also be invalid. It’s not a seperate issue- it occurred in the exactly same election. It’s really quite simple.

No, you don't seem to understand how this works. Each case is separate. I'm suing over Pericles ballot. The sole issue of this case is his ballot. No one's else ballot is being considered here. Someone would have to file a separate case over that.

The Supreme Court Justices has around 15 years of combined experience in Atlasia; including at every level of service. We make mistakes; but you’re in the wrong here.

Ahem, I would like to point out that one of the justices has on an individual basis 14 years of experience in Atlasia   You whippersnappers should add your totals to mine.

[ilikeverin]

Not asking you to reveal exact counts

To be clear, my use of the word "consensus" was deliberate and should be understood literally: there was no justice in disagreement.

I can validate this.

[ilikeverin]

Ilikeverin? You alive?

No, am I dead. However, I have now seen this thread and will try to respond shortly.

*hughughug*,

ilikeverin

When did we become a necrocracy?

Uh oh. We just banned necromancy in the South.

Zoinks!

[ilikeverin]

Ilikeverin? You alive?

No, am I dead. However, I have now seen this thread and will try to respond shortly.

*hughughug*,

ilikeverin

When did we become a necrocracy?

Uh oh. We just banned necromancy in the South.

Zoinks!

Looks like that trip to the Keys we were planning will need to be cancelled.

But, dear, it was to be our honeymoon!