ProCon October 2009 Convention in Indianapolis (Voting on Platform)

[Alexander Hamilton]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

[Alexander Hamilton]

I will support the motion to rename the Party "Liberal Conservative Party."

[Rowan]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

Question: Why do you think you are boss of the RPP? I was told that "everyone was on board".

[Хahar 🤔]

You're not liberal in any sense. That's the DA.

Wait a minute, wasn't I the one who came up with this idea, PiT?

[Alexander Hamilton]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

Question: Why do you think you are boss of the RPP? I was told that "everyone was on board".

You were lied to.

[Rowan]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

Question: Why do you think you are boss of the RPP? I was told that "everyone was on board".

You were lied to.

Well, specifically I was told "anybody that matters" supports the move. So, make of that what you want.

[Alexander Hamilton]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

Question: Why do you think you are boss of the RPP? I was told that "everyone was on board".

You were lied to.

Well, specifically I was told "anybody that matters" supports the move. So, make of that what you want.

Well you must have been told by someone irrelevant then.

[Chief Justice PiT]

Liberal Conservative Party??

     Classical liberal. Market liberal. Australian liberal. You get what I mean.

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

No terms are acceptable. None. If the leadership supported this, then I support instituting a new chairman.

Question: Why do you think you are boss of the RPP? I was told that "everyone was on board".

You were lied to.

Well, specifically I was told "anybody that matters" supports the move. So, make of that what you want.

     The lords were on board, but the vassals had other plans, you see.

You're not liberal in any sense. That's the DA.

Wait a minute, wasn't I the one who came up with this idea, PiT?

     Originally, & I pitched it to various members. I think it was Devilman who came up with Liberal Conservative Party, exactly.

[Alexander Hamilton]

I came up with it.

[Psychic Octopus]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

[Chief Justice PiT]

I came up with it.

     Ah, sorry that I forgot.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to replace the chairman.

[Rowan]

Motion to replace the chairman.

With who exactly?

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to replace the chairman.

With who exactly?

We will have a new election of course. Without your vote of course.

[Chief Justice PiT]

Motion to replace the chairman.

     I think leadership elections are supposed to be done after the general election, actually.

[Rowan]

Can we stop with all of this drama and just get down to business? I didn't rejoin to take part in a Jerry Springer show.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to replace the chairman.

     I think leadership elections are supposed to be done after the general election, actually.

Maybe we can have an emergency vote

[Sewer]

Motion to replace the chairman.

I second this.

[AndrewTX]

Can we stop with all of this drama and just get down to business? I didn't rejoin to take part in a Jerry Springer show.

He films his show here in the Northeast now, did you know this?

[Psychic Octopus]

Motion to replace the chairman.

Although I think Duke has had to face absolute hell during his chairmanship, and I support him, I think we should vote. Seconded.

[afleitch]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

As a liberal conservative myself I'm not seeing it. I don't see anything remotely 'Cameronian' about the RPP.

[Alexander Hamilton]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

As a liberal conservative myself I'm not seeing it. I don't see anything remotely 'Cameronian' about the RPP.

You aren't looking.

[afleitch]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

As a liberal conservative myself I'm not seeing it. I don't see anything remotely 'Cameronian' about the RPP.

You aren't looking.

I've been proposing adapted Tory 'liberal conservative' policy for the past two Senates Trust me I'd have noticed.

Of course if you want to go down that European ideological route then all the best to you.

[Alexander Hamilton]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

As a liberal conservative myself I'm not seeing it. I don't see anything remotely 'Cameronian' about the RPP.

You aren't looking.

I've been proposing adapted Tory 'liberal conservative' policy for the past two Senates Trust me I'd have noticed.

Of course if you want to go down that European ideological route then all the best to you.

I consider myself a liberal conservative or in Canada, a progressive conservative. I know that many of our members share similar ideologies.

[afleitch]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism

I feel this sums up a lot of RPP members ideas and policies.

As a liberal conservative myself I'm not seeing it. I don't see anything remotely 'Cameronian' about the RPP.

You aren't looking.

I've been proposing adapted Tory 'liberal conservative' policy for the past two Senates Trust me I'd have noticed.

Of course if you want to go down that European ideological route then all the best to you.

I consider myself a liberal conservative or in Canada, a progressive conservative. I know that many of our members share similar ideologies.

Well good. I've been trying to coax conservatives in Atlasia over the ground where I've been standing for some time